Tag Archives: Ben Affleck

Review: To the Wonder

If there’s one thing to take from To the Wonder, it’s that Terrence Malick doesn’t listen to his critics. His last film, The Tree of Life, was generally well-received but faced complaints about its lack of plot and unique, meandering visual style, trademarks that return here. To the Wonder has been called a sequel to The Tree of Life, if only in style and theme, but unfortunately it never manages to reach the revelatory, dazzling heights of its predecessor.

 

Image Credit: The Telegraph
Image Credit: The Telegraph

Malick’s script follows a love triangle between Ben Affleck (Argo), Olga Kurylenko (Quantum of Solace) and Rachel McAdams (Midnight in Paris), foregrounding their emotions so much that commonplace personal details are irrelevant. We only find out their names once the credits roll because really, what do names matter? Malick is exploring emotion, not telling a story.

 

 

The narrative drifts between short sketches of Affleck and Kurylenko in and out of love, in moments of bliss and anger, creating an impressionistic overview of their entire relationship. It is a fearless way to make a film but often an effective one. There is a real connection with the struggles of a relationship but this technique often becomes boring, relying too often on close-ups of the two leads in a tender embrace.

 

Appearing in a Malick film can be a very daunting experience. For one thing, there’s the constant fear that your role will disappear in the editing suite as Jessica Chastain (Zero Dark Thirty), Rachel Weisz (The Mummy) and Michael Sheen’s (The Queen) did in this case. Oddly, Javier Bardem’s (Skyfall) role feels like it should have been cut as well, not because of a particularly poor performance but because his appearance as a priest struggling with his faith feels tacked-on.

 

A certain physicality is also prized over any kind of verbal dexterity, with barely any on-screen dialogue featuring in To the Wonder, alongside regular voiceovers. If Quentin Tarantino (Pulp Fiction, Django Unchained) is the talking man’s director then Malick is his restrained opposite, with a style harking back to the silent era, where the body is king.

 

Kurylenko embraces this challenge in a sultry and enervated performance, at once teasing and damaged. She is a twirling dervish in love with life and its simple pleasures, an outlook that Affleck struggles to understand. His character is silent and brooding, often to the point of parody. He is meant to be emotionally distant and afraid of commitment but Affleck puts in a weak performance that makes his character intensely unlikeable and baffling to watch. Affleck appears in his recent default setting of ‘miserable bastard’ and spends most of the film looking comatose or being unsettlingly controlling with Kurylenko. He has greater chemistry and more lines with McAdams, and he clearly feels more comfortable with this more traditional style of acting.

 

As always with Malick, the images are the best part of the film; no one quite captures the beauty of the world like him. Alongside cinematographer Emmanuel Lubezki, he makes every frame a stunning achievement in its own right. Filmed mostly at the magic hour before sunset, the camera revels in the golden glow of the sun, which lurks reassuringly in the background of nearly every shot.

 

Malick’s style is intimate and realistic, relying on handheld shots that nevertheless manage to find something profound and astonishing in the most mundane of situations. Sadly this tactic wears a bit thin after a while, with none of the performances strong enough to support the weight of Malick’s bold visual style.

 

At moments, however, the film is truly triumphant, with Lubezki’s cinematography combining perfectly with Hannan Townshend’s brilliant score. The scenes where Affleck reconnects with McAdams are a highlight, the music fizzing and whirling chaotically before it crescendos into serene beauty as they fall in love all over again.

 

Malick’s dedication to an unconventional narrative style is admirable but in To the Wonder he fails to create the chemistry between his cast that made The Tree of Life such a success. His directing is humble and intimate but this microscopic attention to detail often means the unity of the film is sacrificed. There is a lot to love in To the Wonder but too often you have to force yourself to connect with the characters and plot. For his next few films, the newly-prolific Malick would do well to consider returning to the more traditional narratives of the features that made his name, like Badlands.

 

My Rating: 4 stars

 

Tom Bond, Books Editor, Exeposé Print

 

Our thanks to Exeter Picturehouse for providing Tom Bond with a press pass. You can book tickets to see To the Wonder at Picturehouse via their website

Awards Season Review: Argo

If Argo wins Best Film on Sunday night at the Oscars it will be the first film since 1989 to win the award but not to be recognised for Best Director, reflecting further the strangeness of this year for the Academy, with it being one of the most open races for Best Film in decades.

Image Credit: BBC
Image Credit: BBC

Upon accepting the Bafta award for Best Director Ben Affleck (The Town) described Argo as his ‘Second Act’; his third stint behind the camera is proving to be a hugely successful one, with Argo favourite to win Best Film at the Oscars in a few days.

 

Affleck both directs and stars as the main character, the daring CIA agent Tony Mendez. The film follows the imaginative agent as he constructs the bogus sci-fi film ‘Argo’, to be filmed on location in Iran in order to extract six American diplomats hiding in the Canadian embassy in revolutionary Tehran. Adapted from a true story, Chris Terrio’s head spinning script entertainingly mixes the glam of Hollywood with the unstable Middle East, and showbusiness with government bureaucracy.

 

Billed as a comedy, the film’s selling point is CIA agent Jack O’Donnell (Bryan Cranston) sarcastically describing it as “the best bad idea” they had. However, the gripping suspense and paranoia is also its founding appeal. As the film flits between three settings of crowded and volatile Tehran, the claustrophobic offices of the CIA and sunny L.A, you are left biting your nails as Mendez and the six diplomats attempt to literally scramble out of Iran. Performances by the always captivating Alan Arkin (Little Miss Sunshine) and Bryan Cranston (Breaking Bad), who is really growing into serious roles, added real class to the cast of the film.

 

Through Affleck’s directing, Argo refreshingly combines a big issue with beautiful cinematography. Each location has its own cinematic feel in order to assist the audience through the fast narrative. For example, all the footage in Tehran is on handheld cameras, reminiscent of news footage or a documentary.

 

Where Argo falters however, is the failure to create any great measure of audience empathy for the diplomats in Tehran. Despite being hooked into the suspense of the six diplomats hiding in the embassy, there is no real feel of personal attachment to them, despite the inclusion of the home footage monologues for each character. The spectacle and the entertainment of the film aren’t in any doubt but there isn’t real substance to the horrific situation of the six individuals, nor that of Iran itself.

 

At the core, although it brings the shocking realities of Iran to the attention of Hollywood (both in the film and today) it fails to get its hands dirty. You feel there could be more done with this goldmine of a story by getting under the skin of the audience about an event that still scars the country. The film is also strictly from an American perspective, the Iranian people are portrayed as merely religious and violent, whilst the role of the CIA is glorified and the impact of the Canadian Embassy is downplayed.

 

Film critic Peter Bradshaw perfectly described it as ‘semi quirk’. It is as if Affleck grapples with what kind of film he wants Argo to be, which is endearing, but ultimately harming. This is reflected through the last ten minutes, where Affleck’s work of laying down the foundations of a ‘quirky’ film is lost through a Spielberg-esque cheesy hugs and tears montage of celebrations, which is fitting for the American patriot theme of these awards. However, the film’s ending, with the US flag waving outside a picture book American house, is just a little too much American nationalism to be swallowed comfortably.

 

Argo is a safe option for the Academy, appealing, entertaining and fun, but it will show a reluctance to again reward a certain Quentin Tarintino for Django Unchained and a foreign speaking production in the French film Amour.

 

My Rating: 3 Stars.

 

Flora Cresswell