Tag Archives: discovery

Voyager: Houston we have a probe-lem

Image credits: Sweetie187
Image credits: Sweetie187

With the Voyager 1 probe being the first man-made object ever to leave our solar system, James Coghlan explains what this means for mankind’s great journey into the final frontier.

For all its shortcomings, humankind has managed to achieve a remarkable amount in its rather short existence; in the last five hundred years alone, man has circumnavigated the globe, investigated both poles, and conquered the highest mountains the Earth has to offer. We have climbed every mountain and forded every stream. There is nothing we cannot do – we are unstoppable.

As the first human to look at the place we call home in all its splendour from the surface of another celestial body, one could forgive Neil Armstrong for thinking something along those lines as he stamped his name onto the story of the human race. The culmination of nine years of development, the Apollo 11 mission touched the dreams of millions of people around the globe and forever changed their perceptions of what it means to be human. Not since the launch of the first man-made object into outer space has the potential for extra-terrestrial discovery been so greatly enhanced. But the journey did not stop there.

In spite of the enormity of each of our achievements, mankind has managed to out-do itself time and time again, endlessly increasing its capacity for knowledge and enhancing its appetite for adventure. Everyone thought that the field of science and technology had reached its peak, but eight years after our greatest achievement as a species, the story was no different.

Little did the men and women working on NASA’s Voyager programme know that the probe designated Voyager 1 would go on to penetrate the outer reaches of our solar system’s heliosphere and become the only man-made object in history to enter interstellar space. If that isn’t amazing enough, here are some eye-watering facts: it has been in service for 36 years – hurtling towards the stars at a peak speed of 62,136 kilometres per hour – and has travelled almost 19 billion kilometres, a distance so large that it takes 17 hours for radio messages to reach Earth. That means the probe is 126 astronomical units away from home. Translated into plain English, that’s 126 times the distance between the Earth and our Sun.

Quite an impressive achievement then, especially once you consider that a modern-day sound system can possess more than five times the power that Voyager 1 currently has. However, in spite of its relative technological crudeness, the little probe has a lot riding on its shoulders. Voyager 1 was originally intended to study the planets of the outer solar system, but has recently been burdened with the responsibility of being NASA’s only source of information within interstellar space. No pressure, then.

To be honest, there could not have been a better-qualified piece of equipment for the job. It overtook its sister probe Voyager 2 – launched some two weeks before it – and became the first probe to discover Jupiter’s planetary rings, along with volcanic activity on its moon Io.

Image credits: Sweetie187
Image credits: Sweetie187

It was also the first to capture high-resolution images of Saturn’s moons, identifying surface structures never seen by the Pioneer probes. So, even before it assumed the mantle of being mankind’s most important far-flung creation Voyager 1’s journey had been immensely productive, the information gathered by the probe enough to rewrite astronomy textbooks. Were the people behind the project satisfied?  In one word: no. Like all humans, they wanted more.

Having completed its flybys of Jupiter and Saturn, Voyager 1’s planetary mission came to an end. However, instead of decommissioning the craft NASA chose to direct it past Saturn’s giant moon Titan. This flyby deflected the craft in such a way so as to remove it from the plane of the ecliptic, sending it off into deep space. NASA could have directed the probe to Pluto to complete its part of the Grand Tour, but they didn’t. Voyager 1 was destined to explore more than our home turf, and NASA knew this; the capabilities of the probe extended far beyond the tasks originally assigned to it. NASA’s intentions must have stretched just as far, seeing as both of the probes left this world carrying golden records containing sounds and images selected to portray the diversity of life and culture on Earth. There is no question that NASA intended for these probes to extend the domain of the human race, in both discovery and spirit.

Armed with increased funding and carrying a symbol of human achievement, Voyager 1 hurtled into the unknown and, as we discovered in September, entered interstellar space on the widely agreed date of August 25 2012. It was on this date that changes in the density of charged particles were first detected, thus suggesting that the craft had finally left the clutches of the heliopause at the edge of our solar system and entered the unknown. This date carries with it yet more significance, however, as this was the exact date on which the world lost its greatest pioneer: Neil Armstrong. Perhaps it is fitting that as one great trailblazer passed from us, another took up its mantle; the sense of adventure and discovery was not lost, but passed on. Human endeavour is characterised by one achievement superseding another, and this is exactly what Voyager 1 represents.

The probe is set to continue transmitting data to Earth until 2025, at which point its on-board power systems will not be able to support any of its instruments. Until then, it will inform our understanding of the medium beyond our solar system, providing solid data where before there was only indirect evidence and models.

Naturally after such a momentous achievement there is only one question on my mind: where do we go from here? There are proposals to send autonomous spacecraft to nearby stars, but such vehicles would take centuries to reach their destinations, not decades. Having said that, the human race would not be where it is right now if it did not out-do itself. With Voyager 1, it is safe to say that we have out-done ourselves yet again.

James Coghlan

The Discovery of a Lifetime: Add Spice to Your Meals!

Stuck for cooking ideas? Low on time? Read on…

So you’re a student. You’re sat there right now with certain things running through your mind. Is one of them food, by any chance? I thought as much. ‘What to cook for dinner?’ Sounds about right. Problem is, you’re hungry. Really hungry. You don’t want to spend a long time cooking, because you want to eat NOW…or at least within 15 minutes or so.

Image Credit: pettywood.co.uk
Image Credit: pettywood.co.uk

Well, look no further than Discovery. Heard of them? Yes that’s right – The Mexican food. Think about it now – imagine yourself digging into a perfectly seasoned fajita and your hunger just melting away…

But what could you possibly do?

Well, Discovery has a wealth of products available, from wraps and tortillas to sauces, to seasoning mixes and more! The other day, I tried one of their Mexican BBQ fajitas, with mild seasoning, soured cream sauce and jalapeño salsa, and can honestly say it was delicious. Even the chopped jalapeños I also had were a delight (though maybe refrain from popping too many in your mouth in one go!).

It was the sachet of fajita seasoning that really stood out as being the jewel in Discovery’s crown – perfectly balanced spices, in several varieties, that transformed the diced chicken fillets into something magical. Combined then with the condiments, the tightly packed fajitas were both satisfying and filling and yet somehow made me want more on top of that. One tip though – be modest with your packing. The perfect fajita is made with care, and overflowing tortillas can be a nightmare!

Image Credit: fdin.co.uk
Image Credit: fdin.co.uk

But the best part of it all? It’s quick. It’ll only take as long as it takes for your chicken (or similar) to fry, so you don’t have to go wanting! Fast preparation, and dynamite results – what more could you want from a product? Luckily for you, Discovery products are very easy to find in most supermarkets, so what are you waiting for? Not convinced yet? Well, for those of you who might be arriving at Exeter University for the first time in September, there may be a Discovery-based surprise in your welcome packs that may spice up your first few meals at University… But more on that closer to the time.

Have you tried Discovery recently? Maybe you have some wacky recipe ideas you would like to share? Let us know in the comments below!

Ben Gilbert, Online Lifestyle Editor

Grappling with graphene: what do you know about the material of tomorrow?

Described as a ‘super-material’, the anticipation over the new material graphene in the scientific and consumer world is escalating. Philip Thomas takes a look at what all the fuss is about and some of the more complex issues surrounding this incredible scientific breakthrough.

All photo credits to United States Government Work
The most exciting material of our generation: graphene. All photo credits to United States Government Work.

Graphene is an allotrope of carbon that can be found right underneath our noses. When you write with a standard graphite pencil, a mixture of miniscule graphene flakes and coal are deposited on the piece of paper. This deposit is one of the few two-dimensional materials to have been discovered in physics which is fundamental to its extraordinary properties. Graphene is the thinnest, stiffest, most conductive and most impermeable material known to man. It is an excellent conductor of heat, highly transparent and as flexible as rubber. It is far stronger than diamond or, in other terms, it would take an elephant balanced on a pencil to break through a sheet of graphene the thickness of cling film. Graphene truly is a substance of superlatives. The two scientists at the University of Manchester, Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov, who were accredited with the discovery of graphene were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2010. That’s how scientifically important this material is.

Considering its breathtaking properties, the potential applications of the material are massive. To name but a few, graphene may be used in touch screens, lighting within walls, aircrafts, solar cells, flexible electronics, enhanced batteries, electronic payments, biosensors, DNA detectors and HD-TVs. Even if it fails to deliver in any of these fields, it could also be highly useful in the advancement of energy or medicine. Of course, the time and cost of converting to graphene must be financially viable for businesses but its alleged potential is nonetheless exciting. As Geim said, “No one can accurately predict what the future holds for us, but there are so many potential technologies that have already been suggested for graphene, even statistically the chances are sky-high that graphene will bring around some really important future technologies.

“Among everything I know graphene is my best bet for the next big thing technological breakthrough. Nevertheless, one needs to remember that it takes typically 40 years for a new material to move from academia to consumer shelves.”

Even in times of global economic uncertainty, politicians are finding the money to pump into research regarding the commercialisation of graphene. In December 2012, renowned for his tight fiscal policy, George Osborne gave £22 million to UK universities to develop graphene, taking the total he has granted to over £60 million. The National Graphene Institute is also to be built in Manchester at a cost of £61 million; Professor Novoselov declared himself, ‘delighted’ by the governments’ decision. Perhaps even more surprisingly given the economic woes across the continent, the European Commission, a part of the EU, in January 2013 chose Graphene to be the recipient of a ten-year £850 million Future Emerging Technology grant. They are hopeful that, “it will revolutionise multiple industries and create economic growth and new jobs in Europe”.

Groundbreaking research is being conducted all over the world. All photo credits to samsungtomorrow.
Groundbreaking research is being conducted all over the world. All photo credits to samsungtomorrow.

Although politicians in Europe are investing substantially in graphene, a growing fear is rising that it will not be enough to fight off global competition for patents. A report conducted by CambridgeIP on 15 Jan 2013 showed that since its discovery, the Chinese have 2,204 graphene patent publications, the US 1,754, South Korea 1,160, with the UK lagging far behind with just 54. UK science minister David Willetts simply outlined the problem: “we need to raise our game. It’s the classic problem of Britain inventing something and other countries developing it.” Europe’s struggle with stagnant growth and high unemployment may consequently reduce our ability to compete globally.

Another issue with the development of graphene is what could be labelled as the Concorde syndrome. Heightened by a shortage of public money, if money is pumped into a single project that appears beautiful but has few uses, a lot of time and taxpayers’ funds have been wasted. We can only be hopeful that this is proves to be untrue.

From a scientific perspective, graphene is arguably the most incredible material ever discovered. However, from a commercial perspective, there is still a lot of uncertainty over its future both in terms of development and the ability to compete with Asia.

Richard III: saint, sinner, murderer, victim or pragmatist?

Conor Byrne digs deeper into the circumstances surrounding the discovery of the body of Richard III.

Picture Credits: ChristineGibbs
Richard III, ‘probably the most controversial king in English history’. Picture Credits: ChristineGibbs

Earlier this month, at the University of Leicester it was announced to a highly excited Britain that the body unearthed the previous autumn in a city council car park at Greyfriars, Leicester, was indeed that of the late medieval king Richard III. Scientific analysis indicated that the king had most likely been killed either by a blow from a large bladed weapon which cut off the back off his skull, or by a halberd thrust which gruesomely penetrated his brain. The bones of the body were found to be in a good condition, apart from the fact that the corpse’s feet were missing.

Archaeologists and scientists confirmed that the spine was severely curved, bearing out contemporary sources which held the king to be a hunchback. It is likely that this curvature made one shoulder visibly higher than the other, although this may not have meant that Richard was unable to partake in an active lifestyle. The bones were found to be those of a male in his late twenties to early thirties, which further confirms that the body was Richard’s, who was aged 32 at his death. Richard Buckley announced this Monday: “it is the academic conclusion of the University of Leicester that beyond reasonable doubt, the individual exhumed at Greyfriars in September 2012 is indeed Richard III, the last Plantagenet King of England”. Mitochondrial DNA evidence, soil analysis, and dental tests further confirmed the identification. The Mayor of Leicester, Sir Peter Soulsby, has stated that Richard will be buried at Leicester Cathedral in early 2014, although others proposed that the king should be buried in Westminster Abbey due to his royal status (which Queen Elizabeth, apparently discreetly, opposed), while others argued that the former king should be interred in York Minster, apparently Richard’s preferred place of burial.

Probably the most controversial king in English history, Richard was the youngest son born to Richard, duke of York and his wife Cecily Neville in 1452. Following his brother Edward’s successful usurpation of the English throne in 1461, Richard became Duke of Gloucester and acquired substantial power and influence in the north, where he was much liked and respected. He later married Anne Neville, the daughter of the 16th Earl of Warwick and former Princess of Wales. Edward’s premature death in 1483 created a serious power vacuum at court, with many arguing that Richard feared the hostility of the queen’s family, the Woodvilles, and their desire to exclude Richard from power. In view of this, Richard seized control of the new child king, Edward V, and his younger brother Richard, and installed them in the Tower of London, before executing his political rival Hastings and others of Queen Elizabeth’s family.

What happened is a matter of fierce debate and considerable controversy. Richard’s loyal supporters fiercely deny this, but it seems most likely that it was on Richard’s orders that his nephews, the Princes in the Tower as they hauntingly became known, were murdered, so that he could himself become king of England. As far as facts go, the two boys were last seen in the autumn of 1483, before conspicuously disappearing forevermore. Those who believe that Richard was innocent of their deaths have failed to answer one simple question: if Richard never ordered the boys’ murders, then why did he never produce them and show them to the public, to counter these malicious claims? The fact that he never did so, and remained silent on this issue, strongly suggests that he was indeed responsible for his nephews’ murders. Richard seized the crown in June 1483 and was crowned King of England. His wife, Anne, became queen.

Picture credits: kiranparmar
Richard’s body was unearthed the previous autumn in a city council car park in Greyfriars, Leicester. Picture credits: kiranparmar

Richard was never a popular king, largely because he was both a usurper and because he was believed to be responsible for the murders of the popular princes. The death of his queen in suspicious circumstances in 1485, amidst rumours that Richard poisoned her in order to marry again, further blackened his reputation. Facing rebellion in 1483, and further troubles from his political rival Henry Tudor, Richard finally faced Henry in battle at Bosworth in 1485. The transfer of support of the Stanley family, who had previously supported the king, in battle proved decisive, weakening Richard’s army and eventually leading to the king’s death, deserted by his men in the face of a vicious onslaught from Henry’s army.

During Richard’s reign, the king had attracted praise from some writers, but his reputation was mercilessly destroyed by Shakespeare who depicted him as deformed, evil, and a murderer. In an age which identified deformity with evil, other Tudor writers enthusiastically exploited Richard’s outward deformities as a sign of his inner evil. The works of the Richard III Society have earnestly tried to salvage Richard’s reputation. Whatever his true character, the news this month has proved highly exciting for all lovers of medieval history.