Tag Archives: europe

Amsterdam – Canals, Cycling and Coffee-Shop Culture

A city home to a maze of stunning canals, the infamous Red Light District, and an almost unavoidable coffee-shop culture, Amsterdam is another of Europe’s gems that is certainly worth a visit.

Amsterdam is well used to the constant invasion of tourists, and is filled with plenty of things to do while you’re there. While taking a purely curious wander through the Red Light District you can spend €7 on entry into a sex museum, which may be an incredibly bizarre experience initially, but I assure you once you embrace it is also truly hilarious. After all, who doesn’t want a photo taken with a huge golden phallus?

Photo Credit - Emma Brisdion
Photo Credit – Emma Brisdion

Time it right and see if your visit will coincide with events at Dam Square; during the weekend of our visit the square was stunning and lit up at night with carnival rides and a big ferris wheel, surrounded by delicious smells from food vendors. Take it from me; it would be criminal not to sample one of the hot, chocolate-smothered, Belgian waffles.

Chances are you’ll notice that Amsterdam is home to one popular beer in particular, so another place to visit is also the Heineken Experience. I’d recommend after a cultural trip to the Van Gough Museum, that you take a tourist photo on the IAMSTERDAM sign by the Rijksmuseum, and promptly head over to this very different museum experience (you get to drink free beer).

Photo Credit - Emma Brisdion
Photo Credit – Emma Brisdion

I had gone to support friends who were running the Amsterdam Marathon, and we were following their progress when we decided to try out the public transport. Ordinarily, the trams are an easy way to navigate your way around the city, but let me warn you, there is a big difference between a tram, and a train. When at the platform do not always listen to the advice of the friendly locals, as we ended up on a train instead. To Utrecht, in fact. A completely different city, where there was definitely no marathon.

Instead put your tourist map-reading skills to the test, and join everyone else in renting bikes and taking to the roads. It’s the perfect way to see the city, though beware the locals; there are more bikes on the roads than cars, and they have no problem shoving you out of their way if you are faffing about with directions at a cross-roads. If you’re with a bunch of friends, many bike hire places even offer discounts to group bookings!

You could of course also take a boat tour, but there’s just something about tackling the fast-paced roads that adds to the adventure element of your visit..

 

Emma Brisdion, Online Lifestyle Editor

Like Exepose Lifestyle on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter @ExeposeLStyle

Exploring The Balkans Solo

This summer I decided to pack up my red spotted handkerchief and head to the Balkans for a solo adventure. My parents were concerned for my safety and I was unsure if my plan was overly ambitious or just stupid. However, after a great deal of research and reassurance I felt relatively confident that a re-run of the film ‘Taken’ was unlikely and set off for my three hour flight to the Bulgarian city of Plovdiv.

It’s truly surprising how far away from what you know three hours on a plane can take you. Considering that Bulgaria is an EU country I was surprised at the differences: stray animals everywhere, very little semblance of organisation on the roads and a fascinating mix of modernity and medieval. This contrast continued throughout much of the Balkans, whilst coaches zoomed up the mountainous roads, oxen pulled hay carts next to them.

1445_l
Macedonia
Photo Credit – Beachionary.com

Macedonia quickly became one of my favourites. In Skopje the government has spent millions giving the city a more “monumental” feel, with vast statues and fountains all over the place. Meanwhile Ohrid offers some of the most stunning views and architecture, good weather, a beautiful lake and a good night out (however buy your pre-drinks before 9pm as any later and the sale of alcohol is illegal or black market.) Here I met some amazing friends and it was this lakeside town that made me fall in love with the country.

Onwards and upwards to Kosovo where I was immediately told to “Watch out, because people will traffic you.” Despite this threatening arrival it’s worth a look around, with such a violent recent history it’s surprising to see a statue of Bill Clinton on one of the main boulevards and I even stumbled across a Tony Blair street.

mostar-bosnia-herzegovina
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Photo Credit – my-world-travel-guides.com

Bosnia-Herzegovina offered more memories starting with a 22 hour bus ride. I visited the spot where Franz Ferdinand was shot, and I went waterfall climbing. There was however a much more sombre undertone in Bosnia; unlike the other countries I visited the violence suffered by Bosnia during the war is clear to see, especially in Mostar. Bullet holes riddle buildings in the city centre and tensions are still high between the Croatians and the Bosnians. The average Bosnian waiter earns just €7 a day and swathes of newly built houses lie empty, unsurprising in a country with a 60% youth unemployment rate (comparatively ours is 21%).

Montenegro and Croatia were most homely in feel and it was here that I felt least like a traveller and most like a tourist (although perhaps this is my fault for visiting small towns and spending my days on the beach.) The ancient appeal of towns such as Kotor, Dubrovnik and Zadar is understandable, and unlike other places I visited they crawled with cruise ship tourists even as the season drew to a close in September. By the last day spent in Zadar I was poor, exhausted and desperate for some TLC.

Dubrovnik-Croatia-Harbour-frifotos-2
Croatia
Photo Credit – crystal-clear.com

From the mountains of Bulgaria, to the Macedonian lakes and the beaches of Croatia, my trip was amazing. Sometimes scary and sometimes miserable but mostly a series of eye opening experiences, fun and friends that made me crave another adventure as soon as I got home. I lost my phone, most of my overdraft and a good deal of my naivety, but travelling alone was the best thing I’ve ever done. I understand aspects of Europe that I’d never even considered before but most tellingly I learnt the importance of a hot meal and a bath when I finally got home.

 

Genevieve Kotarska

Inter-railing – Your Ticket To Europe!

Want to get away and explore the continent but can’t choose where to go? Hardly surprising really given the endless choice of cultural gems dispersed amongst the array of European cities. How does one choose between the overpowering romanticism of Florence and the Gothic beauty of Prague? Between the bright lights of Amsterdam and the colourful nature of Barcelona? Or between the idyllic Paris and the historic Berlin? Well, what if you didn’t have to make that choice? Make the most of the close proximity of these European hotspots, just buy yourself an Interrail ticket…and visit them all! Pick a friend or two (or go solo), pack your rucksack and simply hop on a train. Excuse the cliché, but the world really is your oyster.

“Eleven cities in three weeks? Wow, that’s…ambitious” is what people often said when we told them our summer plans, and when having not even left the country yet and our very first train was cancelled, I must admit, I was beginning to agree. But one replacement train and a Eurostar ride later, I found myself half way up the Eiffel Tower with two of my best friends, looking out across the French capital at night. The combination of the tower lit up and sparkling against the black of the Parisian night sky, along with the panoramic views of lights piercing the darkness all across the city, made the end of day one nothing less than enchanting.

 

Photo Credit - Harriet Barter
Photo Credit – Harriet Barter

A few days and a good eleven hours on a train later we found ourselves in country number two, in the incredible city of Barcelona. If you’re looking for colour then Barcelona is the place to go. The coloured and patterned works of Antonio Gaudí, the architectural face of Barcelona, are displayed all around the city (as pointed out on our three hour city bike tour!) with arguably the most iconic being the Sagrada Familia; Gaudí’s still unfinished master-piece at the heart of the city. If you think it’s impressive from the outside just wait until you go in – it’s absolutely breathtaking! And if Gaudí’s colours weren’t enough, be sure to make your way up to the Magic Fountain one evening. This huge fountain, located in front of the National Art Museum of Catalonia, combines light, colour, music and water acrobatics to create a stunning performance, leaving no doubts as to where it gets its name. Undeniably the perfect way to end our stay in Barcelona.

The beauty of Interrail is that you can just hop on a train and within as little as three hours you could be in a totally new country. Which is great…Until the French Transport Workers decide to strike! After a few very stressful days and a replacement bus journey through France, it was ‘adiós España’ and ‘ciao Italia!’ Pizza, pasta, Prosecco, the leaning tower of Pisa, the sunset over Florence, a gondola ride in Venice and a visit to Juliet’s balcony in Verona… To name but only a few of the delights Italy had to offer. I completely fell in love with the Italian culture, and studying Italian means my return trip is already being planned!

 

Photo Credit - Hariet Barter
Photo Credit – Hariet Barter

The more eastern side of our trip gave us a day in Vienna, before a couple of days exploring the Czech capital of Prague. Despite the constant rain, our spirits were not dampened as we loved the overwhelming beauty of the gothic Czech architecture. We also enjoyed an evening of traditional food in an underground restaurant, where we were personally serenaded by a Czech violinist as stuffed animals gazed down upon us from the walls – very surreal!

Our penultimate stop was Berlin, with a visit to the Reichstag being one of the highlights of the whole trip. Not dissimilar to Paris, we were presented with panoramic views of the sun setting over the whole city as we made our way around and up the huge glass dome . The remains of the Berlin Wall are also a must see in the German capital and although we refrained from spending our limited budget on a piece of the wall (10€ for a bit of stone in a pot!), we did spare some change on getting our passports stamped at Check Point Charlie- a fitting souvenir from such an iconic historical city.

Untitled

Another five hours on the train (bringing our grand total to 67 hours spent on trains) took us to Amsterdam. With friends in all the right places we had our own personal tour guide who taught us all there is to know, visiting all the landmarks. We clambered up onto the ‘I Amsterdam’ sign for a photo, and visited the infamous red light district – a very bizarre experience! Charmed by the city and its canals, Amsterdam is high on the list of places to go back to. But, having most definitely had enough of trains by this point, we boarded the ferry at Hoek van Holland and sailed our way back to English turf.

So eleven cities in three weeks may perhaps have been a little ambitious, it was at the same time very achievable, and saved us from having to choose. Having loved every second we would not hesitate in sacrificing a few nights in TP to save for another ticket for another trip to all the places we missed out the first time.

So my advice? Do it while you’re young and do it while you can – these extensive university summer holidays aren’t going to be around forever!

 

Harriet Barter

Comment with: The Freedom Society

Exeposé Comment got together with Liam Taylor, President of the Freedom Society, over a curry to discuss FreedomSoc’s plans for the coming year and their place in university politics.

Exeposé Comment: All of the societies had a busy Freshers’ week trying to sign up as many people as possible. How did you fare?

Liam Taylor: Freshers’ week was very good, a very busy time for us, every society really, but we were happy, we’ve increased membership again this year so we’re going up and up. In just over a year we have gone from one of the smallest societies at the University to one of the biggest political societies. We’re now level pegging  with the other big political societies and it’s just a case of building on last year’s success.

Photo Credit: Exeter Guild
“As a society, broadly we are quite euro-sceptic… We’re in favour of free markets. We want lower taxes but I believe these views represent many more people than just the 15% who say they’d vote for UKIP.”
Photo Credit: Exeter Guild

EC: Obviously you weren’t competing on a level playing field  with some political societies allowing free membership such as the Liberal Democrats. What do you think about that?

LT: Obviously it’s a bit unfair when some societies have an advantage over others.  I think that if they’re allowed to charge free membership, I think that we should be able to as well. It would be a big bonus. It should be a level playing field.

EC: Some people on campus see you as the UKIP society but hiding under a different name. How would you respond to those claims?

LT: We get this quite a lot but it’s not true.  We make a point of not being affiliated to any party and I don’t think there is that much of an overlap to merit the comparisons. UKIP’s big thing is being anti-EU. As a society, broadly we are quite euro-sceptic. I’ll probably get into trouble with a few members for generalising a little bit too much but I’d say we’re in favour of a referendum but then so is a lot of the country. We’re in favour of free markets. We want lower taxes but I believe these views represent many more people than just the 15% who say they’d vote for UKIP.

EC: Over the last few months the economy has shown small signs of improvement. Are you optimistic for the future?

LT: As I mentioned during the cross-party leaders’ debate last week, I don’t think that this is sustainable growth. It’s a bit of window dressing largely due to George Osborne’s flagship ‘Help to Buy’ scheme which is inflating the same housing bubble that burst causing the crisis in the first place.  It’s a bit of political manipulation to try and get them over the next election but all of our structural problems remain as bad as ever.

EC: You briefly touched upon the leaders’ debate there, how do you think it went? Do you think that we can see more in the future?

LT: Yes, definitely, I think it was a really good event. There was lots of participation from the audience. It’s always good to debate with people who have opposing views just to discuss ideas.  I’d be happy to do more, at the moment we haven’t talked about doing more but I think the other Presidents are quite keen so hopefully we will see more of those down the line.

EC: Obviously being head of a political society sets you up nicely for a career in politics. Is this something that you’re going to look at pursuing?

LT: I get asked this quite a lot, but no, I’m not interested to get into politics in the slightest. I find it hard to align myself with any political party. I’m too stubborn and unwilling to toe any party line and do all of the necessary lying and selling out that it takes to climb up the greasy pole of politics.

EC: At the moment we’re in conference season and all the parties are gearing themselves up for the 2015 general election. How do you see that going?

LT: I take the uncontroversial opinion that there will be another hung parliament. I can’t see any party having the strength to muster a majority. The Conservatives are picking up a bit but I can’t see anyone who didn’t vote for Cameron in 2010 voting for him this time round. I think UKIP only need about 6% of the vote to cripple any chances of a majority for better or for worse. It’s the same with Labour. Ed Miliband has been drifting further to the left, making his party more unelectable by the day and the Liberal Democrats are still as unpopular as ever after stabbing students in the back.  So I think all three of the main parties are in a lot of trouble. It will just be a question of who is in the least worst position.

EC: What Freedom Society events have you got coming up in the next few weeks?

LT: We’ve got our first big social after Freshers’ which takes place on Wednesday at George’s Meeting House. There’ll be a free drinks deal for members. Hopefully if anyone hasn’t already joined  they’ll be able to sign up on the night. We’re putting a couple of hundred quid behind the bar which should be a good return on peoples’ £5 membership fee. We make sure to make all our events open to non-members as well. Later in the term, we’re having a big EU debate– an event jointly held with Labour on the 7th October. We’ve got some MEPs  coming down and a few think tankers and directors of Better Off Out so it should be a good debate to kick off the term.

Dave Reynolds and James Bennett, Online Comment Editors

Have FreedomSoc done enough to disassociate themselves with UKIP or any other political party? Following the cross-party debate, do they deserve their place on an inter-party panel? Leave a comment below or write to the Comment team at the Exeposé Comment Facebook Group or on Twitter @CommentExepose. If a society or organisation that you are involved in is interested in appearing in this feature, contact us at exepose-comment@xmedia.ex.ac.uk.

Winston McKenzie's New Fight

Photo Credits: BBCAt the recent UKIP spring conference, Exeposé interviewed party member Winston McKenzie, who shared his views on racism, David Cameron and the Conservative government, and young people helping UKIP on their journey to power.

Winston McKenzie, UKIP member and ex-boxer, is probably most well known in politics for two things.

Firstly, he came third in the North Croydon by-election, beating the Liberal Democrat candidate Marisha Ray. Overall, UKIP’s votes rose by 4% to 5.7% in the election. This, McKenzie told Exeposé, ‘was brilliant’, and clearly a boost to the party’s ego. Secondly, you may remember the public backlash that ensued after he claimed adoption by gay couples constituted ‘child abuse.’ But McKenzie is not fazed by the criticism.

The 59-year-old politician, who has been a member of every major political party at some point in the last thirty years, still believes UKIP will go far. He told Exeposé: ‘I really sincerely hope that we sink the Tories in the forthcoming local elections, I hope that we sink them in the general election and I hope that we sink them in the European election so that they’re wiped off the face of the earth.’

It seems apparent that his dislike of the Conservatives is rooted in his evolving conflict with Prime Minister David Cameron. McKenzie explained: ‘He (Cameron) tries to be tough but he’s soft so I couldn’t aspire to him.’ McKenzie divulged that he has taken offence from ‘the quips that he (Cameron) has made about UKIP being fruitcakes and closet racists,’ which were ‘very disrespectful.’ He added: ‘I think it’s a personal jibe at me.’

But McKenzie praises UKIP’s leader Nigel Farage, saying that he is ‘greatly inspired’ by him. McKenzie also feels that UKIP are inspirational to young people and are the party of the future. ‘Many young people are looking at UKIP as the party that is listening to people, and as the party that will carry their voice,’ he told Exeposé.

‘We are turning over a new leaf now where we are getting a lot of young people showing interest in the party and that is great.’ He added: ‘I’m so amazed to hear the young people in UKIP holding seminars and talking about the future and putting ideas to the party, it’s absolutely amazing.

‘These young men and women are going to make great leaders one day.’

On the question of racism, of which UKIP are so often accused, McKenzie does not seem too fazed. ‘As far as UKIP is concerned I don’t notice racism on the level that some people do.’ But he does recognise the issue of racism. ‘Racism is everywhere. It’s everywhere in all walks of society. Racism is blatant, it’s abundant and it’s alive and kicking.’

Contrary to popular belief, McKenzie also believes that UKIP is becoming more attractive to ‘black and ethnic people’ who are ‘showing far greater interest in the party.’ Of this McKenzie noted: ‘I’m glad to say I’ve contributed to that.’

Where many may see racism as UKIP’s weak point, its relationship with other countries is certainly its strength for Eurocsceptics. There is no doubt that voters are drawn to UKIP for its unwavering stance on Europe and immigration.

McKenzie recognises this and believes the current system of electing MEPs is ‘a travesty of justice.’ He added: ‘They are unelected bureaucrats which we are throwing our money to and asking them to rule us, asking them to make policies on our behalf.’ McKenzie sees the European Union as a ‘big boy’s club’ and blames David Cameron for seeing fit to ‘brush this terrible injustice under the carpet.’

It must be quite crowded under that carpet, as McKenzie also feels that Cameron has failed to act upon the role of the bankers in the downturn of the economy. He told Exeposé: ‘They’ve taken our money; they’ve taken our souls and everything we own.’

Meg Lawrence, Features Editor

Interviewed by James Roberts, Features Editor

Comment at the UKIP Conference

Our Chancellor seen here signing off on last week's budget.
Our Chancellor seen here signing off on last week’s budget.
Photo Credit: pdicko via Compfight cc

Earlier in the week, we asked Ben Bradshaw (Labour MP for Exeter) for his views on UKIP and he tweeted, “Europhobic socially conservative right wing party with incoherent economic policy currently boosted by protest voting”. With that in mind Exeposé Comment decided to spend the day at the UKIP Spring Conference at The University of Exeter’s own Great Hall to investigate that claim.

Throughout the day we were witness to a variety of party speakers, only one of which didn’t know the difference between the Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne and  former two-time World Heavyweight Champion turned grill advocate George Foreman. Although there was no substantive mention of the word, “deficit” in any speech amid a wash of arguably half-baked environmental, transport and educational policy, it was made quite clear that, unsurprisingly, UKIP are quite vehemently anti-EU. 

We took advantage of our increasing Facebook following to ask if it was in Britain’s national interest to leave the European Union. Of those polled, 63% responded that, no, Britain’s interests in fact lie in remaining in the EU. Of the members of the audience at the conference who we interviewed, Will Himms of Somerset and Joan Martin of Cinderford both strongly disagreed.

A majority of those polled by Exeposé Comment favoured remaining within the EU.
A majority of those polled by Exeposé Comment favoured remaining within the EU.

“I like all of the countries in it, but I don’t think that it’s the right thing to try and force them all to be together”, said Will. Joan agreed and added, “I look at the state of the other countries in the EU and I don’t want that for us.” On the other hand Joel Mason, Vice President of Exeter University Liberal Democrat Society, weighed in saying, “I’m not going to argue that the EU’s perfect; far from it, it’s got many problems but I think it would be a very rash thing to overlook a lot of the benefits that we get from the EU. [Business and crime among other issues] exist across borders…we need to try to adopt a transnational approach which is what the European Union allows us to do.” It seems clear that there is a need for a degree of reform concerning our role in the EU, but the balance of cost versus reward remains unclear: are we paying too much in for little in return?

Almost three quarters of students polled agreed that a vote for UKIP is nothing more than a protest vote.
Almost three quarters of students polled agreed that a vote for UKIP is nothing more than a protest vote.

Nigel Farage was quick to dismiss UKIP’s recent surge in popularity as a protest vote, however the overwhelming response from the Exeter student community has seen it as just that. Of those polled, just 28%  believed that UKIP could now be considered a major force in British politics. We caught up with Jonno White, chairman of the Debate Society, who said in no uncertain terms that, “For the first time in a very long time the right is split in this country. [UKIP] seem to think that they can change politics…it is really a protest vote, now [the Liberal Democrats] are in government there’s no real other party to vote for in protest.” This sentiment was echoed by politics graduate Rob Owen who said, “They are a splinter group which is out of touch with most people in this country. They only have one major point in their manifesto and they will get swallowed back into the Conservatives within two years.” In a response to the aforementioned poll, UKIP sympathiser and Exeter student Nick Best stated that, “Whatever you think of their policies you cannot deny they are a major party. They are going to do very well in future elections. They have a huge impact in Tory marginals, that is a major force.”

Farage may need to extend his reach out past the stereotypical UKIP voter. Photo Credit: Paul Russell99 via Compfight cc
Farage may need to extend his reach out past the stereotypical UKIP voter.
Photo Credit: Paul Russell99 via Compfight cc

UKIP were taking the opportunity at their Spring Conference to prove how diverse a political party they are, with a presentation from candidate Winston McKenzie on UKIP’s contribution to, “the black and ethnic community” and a rather oddly scripted speech from extreme-right Bulgarian MEP Slavcho “Slavi” Binev concerning his professed friendship with Farage and his promises not to, “claim benefits while here” or, “bring his horse and cart”. There was a tangible tension on the topic of immigration which might lead many to think that UKIP’s anti-EU sentiments may not come from such an economic standpoint. There was  definitely an observable demographic in the conference audience; the majority of attendees were ageing and white. The challenge for UKIP is to increase their popularity with a new generation. Until then, as seen in our own polls, younger people will arguably still consider them nothing more than a minor party.

Dave Reynolds and James Bennett, Exeposé Comment.

For further reading see  This isn’t the protest vote you’re looking for: Why we should say no to UKIP and UKIP: Filling the Void and Here to StayYou’ve read the views of a variety of students and UKIP supporters. What, if anything, resonated with you or do you strongly disagree with? Leave a comment below or write to the Comment team at the Exeposé Comment Facebook Group.

This Isn't the Protest Vote You’re Looking For: Why We Should Say No to UKIP

Leader of Exeter Labour Students, Dan Richards and  Gender and Equalities Society Treasurer George Causer examine UKIP’s place in modern British politics. Below, Dan suggests that a vote for UKIP is nothing more than a misinformed protest vote and following suit in an interview with Exeposé Comment,  George condemns UKIP as, “out of touch with modern Britain”.

Those among you who look with glee at the rise of the UK Independence Party, and were counting down the days until Nigel ‘the Chosen one’ Farage graced the University with his presence at the  UKIP  Spring Conference should really ask yourselves a question: Are you really a UKIP supporter? Or are you simply a disillusioned individual, tired of party politics, who has been unfortunately led astray by the dark lord himself?

UKIP to me is nothing more than a protest vote for one simple reason. They only have one well-known policy, a policy which they manage somehow to link to every aspect of the British political system in an attempt to tap into the supposed wide-spread Euro-scepticism that currently exists in Britain. In other words, “If that big, mean and nasty European Union would just leave us jolly-well alone, we respectable Brits would be much better off!” Their entire platform is based upon a simplistic, reductionist view of the European Union. To truly give your support to a party, there has to be more than one issue with which you agree with them on and I would be surprised if many people could name a different UKIP policy.

"I believe a vote of confidence for the EU would be the response of the public once both sides of the argument were put forward..." Photo Credit: rockcohen via Compfight cc
“I believe a vote of confidence for the EU would be the response of the public once both sides of the argument were put forward…”
Photo Credit: rockcohen via Compfight cc

As head of Labour Students, it is to nobody’s surprise I disagree with the policies of UKIP. I disagree with their ‘death to Europe’ attitude and believe that leaving the Union would be disastrous for Britain; but what most perplexes me about UKIP is the rest of the party’s platform and what would be left once they had removed the ‘coven’ of European bureaucrats. A couple of examples of their policies from their manifesto should show you what I mean. When it comes to the economy, the tax cuts and alterations they propose, although seemingly giving money back to the people, would make it almost impossible for them to protect the frontline services they promise to uphold. Their social policy is bleaker still, with UKIP claiming that ‘Britishness’ is under threat from multiculturalism (I do not know how we sleep at night!) and that they wish to teach a history of Britain in schools which, as a historian myself, appears to be somewhat at odds with the truth.

But I am in favour of a referendum on the European Union. We need a debate to show both sides of Europe for a change. I believe a vote of confidence for the EU would be the response of the public once both sides of the argument were put forward and with this, a dagger would be plunged into the heart of UKIP. The current protest vote party would once again be the black sheep of UK politics. We should not celebrate their arrival in Exeter but rather look forward to their eventual farewell from the political scene altogether!

Dan Richards.

 In the following interview with Exeposé Comment, George Causer examines UKIP not only as a simple protest vote, but as importantly a party with no, “coherent policy platform”.

Exeposé Comment: How would you sum up UKIP?

George Causer: I completely agree with David Cameron that most UKIP voters are a bunch of “fruit cakes” and “closet racists”. Their policy platform is incoherent. They want to hark back to a Britain that doesn’t exist anymore. Issues such as gay marriage show that they’re not up with social trends. Frankly, I believe that most UKIP voters are old Daily Mail readers who are out of touch with modern Britain.

EC: Why have UKIP become so successful, so quickly?

GC: I think it is because of the complete and utter collapse of the Liberal Democrat option as a protest vote. [The Liberal Democrats] seem to have compromised on their beliefs- they made unaffordable promises such as abolishing tuition fees. UKIP haven’t got the trappings of power so can make unaffordable and out of touch commitments which they have no intention to keep.

EC: What do you think of our relationship with the European Union?

GC: I think our relationship with the EU needs to be changed.  We give too much money to schemes such as the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) which goes to subsidising French farmers at the detriment of starving Africans who can’t trade their way out of poverty. However I don’t think we should pull out of the EU; that would be the removal of a foreign market that we trade with and a silly move to make at this time. What we need to do is renegotiate, not leave.

EC: What are the main problems that face UKIP in their struggle to be considered a serious political party?

GC: They need some policies other than leaving the EU. At the moment they have a hotchpotch of unaffordable spending commitments where they say they can cut taxes for everyone whilst at the same time increasing the military budget, and spending more money on schools and the NHS. They also suggest a flat rate of income tax which would be grossly unfair. They need to think through a coherent policy platform. Also, they need to be less dependent on Nigel Farage…outside of Farage they have no credible political figures who any members of the general public would recognise. UKIP need to build up local council bases, they currently have a very low amount of councillors compared to the major parties.

EC: How long can UKIP maintain their current impressive polling figures?

GC: I think they’ll win the European elections when the public realise that it’s a vote to stick two fingers up to the EU and not really elect a government, but they’ll fizzle out in 2014/15; maybe because of more media exposure regarding their absurd policy plan and I think that by the time the General Election comes along they’ll be back to 6%. It will still be enough to damage the Conservatives but not enough to win them many seats.

For the case made for UKIP be sure to read UKIP: Filling the Void and Here to Stay. Is UKIP the only party offering a serious stance on EU referendum? Or are they simply reaping the protest vote from an unsatisfied conservative voter? Give a reply below or post your comment to the Exeposé Comment Facebook Group.

UKIP's New Attraction?

Photo credits to Jari Jackonen
Photo credits to Jari Jackonen
As the UKIP spring conference gets underway in Exeter University’s Great Hall, Meg Lawrence asks whether their surprising election result in the Eastleigh by-election was merely the result of political protest or the start of a new trend of growing popularity for the party.

Nigel Farage, leader of UKIP, is undoubtedly confident in his party’s position following the recent Eastleigh by-election. Although the seat was won by the Liberal Democrat candidate Mike Thornton, UKIP gained almost 28% of the vote, ahead of the Conservative candidate Maria Hutchings, who won just 14%. Whilst some claim this victory over the Conservative and Labour parties is merely the result of political protest, Farage has assured his audience at the Exeter conference that this recent surge in votes reflects growing support for the party.

There’s no doubt that he knows how to pour a soothing balm over the voting public’s open sores, and he’s adept at capitalising on key issues that are always so prominent in the midst of a recession. Hence we see the regular reappearance of immigration, Europe, taxation and class in his rhetoric. But, how likely is he to turn this recent support into effective politics?

UKIP, formed in the 1990s, are yet to hold a seat in the House of Commons, and have been criticised by many for their anti-immigration policies. Speaking at the conference, Farage claimed that the Eastleigh results revealed a “wholesale rejection of the political class”. He went on to state: “It’s something far more powerful than a protest vote. Actually the vast majority of the people going out and voting UKIP in these by-elections do so because we are the people that are putting forward positive alternative policies that would make this country a better and prouder place.”

Here, Farage talks sense in so much as the voting public wants a better and prouder country- one where bankers don’t get away with uncheckable greed, politicians don’t fleece the expenses systems, bosses don’t look the other way when they recognise wrong doing and journalists don’t use underhand methods to extract an exclusive story. They’re after a country that is honest, fair and free. But no political party, least of all UKIP, is promising that. UKIP’s policies play to people’s fears and that doesn’t make the country any better or prouder, but rather encourages negative views towards immigrants and Britain’s stance in Europe.

The Eastleigh by-election itself was proof of the fact that you don’t need a popular political manifesto to gain votes. Ray Hall’s Beer, Baccy and Crumpet Party gained a total of 235 votes in the by-election, whilst David Bishop’s Elvis Loves Pets party received 72 votes. Perhaps not all voters were quite so light hearted in their voting, but there is no doubt that UKIP gained more votes because the Conservative, Labour and Liberal Democrat parties consistently fail to deliver their promises.

For as long as we’re in recession, Farage will find favour with the voting public. The real test will be how popular he remains once unemployment and the economy are no longer keeping the voting public awake at night.

Meg Lawrence, Online Features Editor 

Reading the Unexpected: An interview with two narrators of the Holocaust

Inspired by the Holocaust Memorial Week of 21-27th January, Georgina Holland began to explore the difficult subject through literature. One month on, she discusses two great books which take a surprising new look at the history of WW2, and questions the writers behind them…

savage

During the Holocaust memorial week of January, I attended a book talk by British author and historian Keith Lowe. Listening to Lowe talk about his research, the testimonies of Holocaust survivors, his findings, as well as to the reactions of those in the audience, inspired me to read into a subject that I only really had an understanding of from time spent in history lessons. In doing so I came across two books, a fiction and a non-fiction, which approached the topic with a surprisingly fresh and innovative approach. Both texts caught me by surprise and taught me that such events can be explored outside of the classroom.

I began with Keith Lowe’s own book; Savage Continent. This was a book which explored an unexpected era – the Holocaust’s aftermath. Lowe focuses in on Europe in the years 1944-1949; a time of chaos, political upheaval, legal uncertainty, and unconstrained violence. Lowe explained that his aim with Savage Continent was to deal with the consequences of the war and of the Holocaust, to highlight how the war did not end neatly, and, in many parts of continental Europe, how it didn’t really end at all. He explained, “we have a cosy idea that May 8th came along and there was a big party […] and everything went back to normal”. “There was the party” he tells us, “but they woke up with the mother of all hangovers.” In Germany for example, there was no police, no electricity, no government; whole institutions were wiped out in Eastern Europe. “This book is about that period of chaos where nobody knows what the future will hold.”

And this is what really set the book apart for me – it deals with the unexpected. Not only does it deal with the reader’s expectations of what a history book about WWII will discuss, but it challenges the misconceptions of how the war ended and what happened next. In particular, Lowe excels when dealing with the issue of those who survived the Holocaust and their ‘what happened next’. He tells us that Jews returned home not to “sympathy”, but instead to an “embarassed silence”. For example, Lowe describes the difficulty for Jews who survived the war but returned home to find that there belongings had been taken up by former friends and neighbours. During his research, he came upon an old joke in Budapest: “A Jew returns from the concentration campus and sees his friend. His friend says to him, ‘it’s so good to see you, how are you?’ The Jew replies, ‘it was awful, and now all I have is the shirt on your back.'”

If you are looking for a book which will delve into the unexplored history of the Second World War, then Savage Continent is the book for you. It’s approach is entirely unexpected and sheds new light on a subject which has  been analysed (and rightly so) time and time again. When asked if anything in he was surprised by his findings, Lowe admitted that even he was shocked at the level of destruction: “I was ignorant as to the extent of the damage in Italy”, for example.  Lowe was also surprised by the tactics that he would have to employ during his research, learning that “it’s what is left unspoken that sometimes gives the biggest clue.” And that is what Savage Continent seems to me to do, to explore the unspoken and analyse the unexpected.

warsawFrom an unexpected historical text, to a emotional work of fiction, I turned next to a novel in my quest to read into the Holocaust and its history. I came upon Richard Foreman’s Warsaw. The book focuses on three characters in the Warsaw ghetto, 1942: Adam Duritz, a corrupt Jewish policeman; Thomas Abendroth, a German soldier; and Jessica Rubenstein, a beautiful and vulnerable Jewish girl. For these characters their only salvation in a hostile environment which breeds corruption, as well as disease and death, will be love. I questioned Foreman on his motives for writing the book, his approach in doing so, and his experiences in writing about such an emotional and difficult era of history. Surprisingly his research began not with Germany, but with Russia: “in a sense the book is partly a homage to certain 19th century Russian novelists I read in my early twenties, the research was already half done from devouring Russian literature years ago. In regards to the more conventional research into the history behind the Warsaw Ghetto I was fortunate in knowing a number of World War Two historians who could point me in the direction of the best books to read.”

At no point does Foreman soften the subject of the Holocaust. Although peppered with stories of love, this is certainly not a romantic story of good overcoming evil, and  his descriptions of the treatment of Jews can, at times, be extremely graphic and sobering. I asked Foreman if these scenes were as difficult to write as they are to read: “The chapters and scenes were planned beforehand in many respects, which perhaps lessened the drama or trauma I felt when writing certain sections of the books. But even now there are scenes in the novel which can provoke powerful emotions when I approach Warsaw as a reader, as opposed to writer. Although I have never been a Jewish policeman or German soldier I would be lying if I said that the book is not autobiographical in some ways. Reading and writing Warsaw was an act of catharsis, as well as creativity. It took a lot out of me. I’m just glad that when people read it the book gives something back.”

What I loved about Warsaw was its brave approach to the subject of the Holocaust; particularly in the handling of the character of a German soldier which is, in many ways, a positive one. Foreman told me that “should Warsaw have been written shortly after the war I may have received criticism for creating the character of Thomas – a “good” German soldier – but I think both British and German readers are now ready for such a sympathetic portrait.” And this is where the motive of both books can be linked, in their innovative approaches to creating a portrait of the Holocaust and its history.  As Foreman explains; “I was conscious of trying to expand the reader’s understanding of the Third Reich, as well as of the Warsaw Ghetto.”

Upon purchasing both books I had expected to come away with a better understanding of the history of the Second World War and to have read a book which attempts to put into words the narrative of those who experienced it. In many ways this is exactly what I got, but I also gained so much more. Whether through an exploration of an era which is often misunderstood, or by telling the story of a group that was denied a voice, both Lowe and Foreman provided me with a new means of understanding WWII and its aftermath. I would thoroughly recommend both of these texts to those who are also interested in expanding their understanding of a period of history which is marked by war, death, and the unexpected.

By Georgina Holland – Exeposé Online Books Editor

Click here to purchase Richard Foreman’s e-book ‘Warsaw’ for just £2.99
Click here to purchase Keith Lowe’s Save Continent via Amazon

 

Our future in our hands: debating the EU referendum

As the UK’s participation in the EU comes under the spotlight once again, two Exeposé Online writers debate what should be done.

“Britain should take the initiative to seriously strive for a new deal.”

Dom Madar argues the case for the EU referendum.
 
Picture credits: European Parliament
Picture credits: European Parliament

There’s always that guy at the party, standing apart from the rest and not really talking to anybody. The EU club – like any other – has its very own awkward member. The British contingent is becoming increasingly fed up with the invitation and the majority want to head straight for the door. It had reached that point in the night when a toast was in order: instead of politely raising his glass in tribute David Cameron spoke with frankness about the fundamental differences between us and them and the severe flaws in the current system; ultimately he asserted we should keep our membership, albeit on drastically renegotiated terms.

Europe is rarely referred to in the first person on our isolated and proud island. Past glories of conquer and empire have left a self-inflated sense of grandeur, coupled with a bizarrely snobbish attitude towards our Continental cousins. Over the last century freedom and liberty have been championed as Anglo-American concepts driving the world forward. Europe in that time, however, has been purged with draconian dictatorships pursuing Communist and Fascist extremism. Two World Wars and one Cold War later democracy did eventually win out. Not without a chilling level of sacrifice and bloodshed though. It’s hard to genuinely understand the mind-set of older generations gravely affected by such events. I suspect many have a deeply rooted fear of German-led European tyranny transforming our stable democracy into something more resemblant of the Galactic Empire. For most students, however, Europe provides boundless potential as the place next door for gallivanting in search of adventure and relaxation. It certainly sounds all very jolly to be part of one large happy family looking out for the interests of everyone else. Yet, as Cameron consistently pointed out, the EU has strayed far from the original principles it was founded on.

Political issues always have impressive habits of coaxing strongly-held opinions from people – usually based far more on emotion and anecdotal evidence rather than stone cold facts and rational thought. We have enough apathy towards domestic politics, let alone the continental version. How much do you really know about the European Union? – Who runs it and how are those in power appointed and held accountable? How much money do we really put in and what do we get out? The name of the President would be a start.

Cameron admitted that political union was never what Britain wanted: free borders on immigration leave the UK powerless to put forward its own proposals on the matter regardless of the widespread discontent. The European Court of Human Rights meanwhile dictates to us which of our own terrorists we can deport and is currently considering whether to force all members to give certain prisoners the vote. Italy and Greece have already had their elected leaders removed and replaced by technocrats and the latest idea being toyed about in Brussels is a proposal to regulate and censor the press in every member state. How democratic does that sound to you?

Increasingly petty EU laws crippling small business and development contradicts the free trade agreement it’s based on. At the heart of the conundrum inevitably lies London; that cosmopolitan giant of global finance and capital so at odds with the left-leaning EU. The City enjoys the unique luxury of being the only one of its ilk inside the single market – a key reason why so many companies invest there. The EU’s obsessive pursuit of financial taxation and regulation would have a disproportionately damaging effect on our London-centric economy.

For many Europe evokes powerful feelings of old-world beauty, blazing sunshine, cheap booze and sexual liberation. It’s a continent bursting with culture and exoticism in every corner. However, emotional sentiment mustn’t mask the grim reality: the EU at present has become bloated and conceited – too caught up in its previous successes and too stubborn to admit its current failings. Cameron promised an In-Out referendum in the hope that the growing reservations of our citizens are taken seriously. His speech accurately underlined the problem, while simultaneously showcasing his admiration of the objectives the EU was founded on.

The prevention of World War III should never be underestimated. An institution stretching across an entire continent, producing almost a quarter of global GDP and populated by over 500 million has staggering potential. If Britain really is – as those zealous patriots like to claim – a true world leader, backing out when the going gets tough is a weak and cowardly move. With rising anger in other nations Britain should take the initiative to seriously strive for a new deal and project greater influence within the EU. It will be a daunting challenge but one worth taking on.

Britain isn’t a special member, though it is characteristically at least quite different. Nobody is demanding free cocktails all night; however a couple more beers and a compromised playlist more in tune to our tastes would be nice in exchange for that hefty membership fee we annually pay. We don’t expect to agree on everything but a good host should be as accommodating as possible to even the most awkward of guests.

 “A referendum will hurt the UK’s already strained relationship with other European powers.”

Rory Morgan expresses his doubts about Cameron’s plans regarding the European Union.
 
Picture credits: UK Representation to the EU
Picture credits: UK Representation to the EU

Last month, after much delay and anticipation, Prime Minister David Cameron outlined his plans for a referendum on UK membership of the European Union. Mr Cameron’s plans to hold a referendum and reasoning were somewhat overshadowed by his statement this would only occur if he was re-elected, making it quite clear this referendum is a tactless campaign ploy. The Conservative party in a recent poll trailed Labour by 11 points and in the same poll 51 per cent of voters stated they would prefer Boris Johnson as Prime Minister against 30 per cent for David Cameron. So what do you do when polls are against you? You campaign, and it seems Mr Cameron has started quite early.

His reasoning that in this economic climate Europe is far too weak for such a referendum is correct, but his suggestion that Europe will be much more stable in 2016 seems far stretched and a little too optimistic. The official announcement of such a referendum will also most likely hurt the United Kingdom’s already strained relationship with other European powers. The fact is it does not look good at this time of extreme economic fragility in Europe for Britain to even publicly contemplate adopting a more isolationist policy against the countries we trade with and profit from.

Political opinion is also not favourable across the pond with Obama’s Press Secretary Jay Carney stating their belief that Britain was “stronger as a result of its European membership”. It is a shame Mr Cameron has not taken stock of this statement and realised how little interest the rest of the world would have in a small island with comparatively few resources of its own. Membership of the European Union grants us far more global influence, which is pivotal for a country that relies so substantially on trade.

Mr Cameron’s speech also seemed to yet again demonstrate his failure to understand the concept of compromise and the obvious benefits of the EU. His demands for a more influential voice for Britain, as well as more independence from the EU, will most likely fall on deaf ears as the two demands completely contradict each other. No country should expect more influence with less responsibility, which essentially is what he is asking for. Demands are also less likely to be met if other EU members consider the fact Britain may not be a member for much longer.

The repercussions of leaving the EU also seemed to be glossed over and belittled by Cameron. For example what would become of the many immigrants from Europe who currently (and legally) live in the UK? And what would this mean for the Britons who migrate or have migrated to the rest of Europe? An unnecessary mess of legislation would most probably result.

The most worrying aspect of this referendum however is quite simply the gravitas of the decision. Is the general public, especially in this climate of animosity, truly qualified to weigh up and decide if the benefits outweigh the detriments of staying in the EU? After all, one thing Cameron did get right in his speech was the statement that leaving would be a ‘one-way’ ticket, with no return. This is not a decision that can be rectified once made and it feels wrong that the rest of parliament did not take a vote on this before it was announced.

Unfortunately, it seems this rash popularity attempt is so far doing the trick, with the Conservatives moving up three points to 33 per cent in the latest opinion polls. Perhaps this referendum will help achieve an election victory in 2015, but the inevitably dire consequences would certainly prevent a subsequent one.