Tag Archives: Steven Finn

How can English cricket rise again?

It seems likely Andy Flower will continue his role despite calls for his head. Photo: yorkshirepost.co.uk
It seems likely Andy Flower will continue in his current role despite calls for his head. Photo: yorkshirepost.co.uk

Ben Pullan examines what went wrong for England during the recently concluded Ashes and looks at what options they may have to turn around their lacklustre form.

In years to come, 5 January 2014 will be viewed as one of the lowest points in England’s long association with Test Match Cricket. Fans of the game, looking back, will scarcely be able to believe that an team full of some of England’s most celebrated players ever managed to lose a series 5-0 against an Australian side whom they had beaten 3-0 only four months previously.

Indeed, after further investigation, they will probably think they are reading some sort of joke, written by an Aussie wag. They will see ridiculous margins of victory in every Test Match, and encounter seemingly stereotyped scenarios: the batsman who can’t take the pressure, has a breakdown and then runs off home; the formerly great bowler who decides he has no other option than to retire at a time when it could not be less convenient for the team; and a captain who is clueless.

On the other side of the coin, they will read about the outstanding performances of two 36-year-olds, deemed by many to be past their sell by date, achieving fairytale success; a batsman, who turned himself from being a left-hook-swinging laughing stock into a destroyer of England’s bowling; and a bowler, who came into the series as a joke, but left it as a legend.

Yes, there has been very little about this series that anyone would have expected. Though the Aussies had shown some signs of resurgence prior to the series, most expected an England win – or, if not, a closely fought series at the least. No one would have predicted what has happened here – that Australia have walked all over England in each of the five matches and have barely broken sweat.

Never has an England team ceded a series so easily; even the nadir of England cricket in recent times – the 5-0 whitewash of 2006/07 – saw England put up a fight in at least one of the Test Matches. And the worst thing about it is that in that series, the Australian side featured names such as Langer, Hayden, Ponting, Martyn, Hussey, Gilchrist, Warne, McGrath and Lee. The Australian side of 2013 / ‘14 were no such galácticos. Indeed, after being whitewashed themselves by India earlier this year, many were of the view that they were the worst Australian cricket team ever.

Ben Stokes is one of English cricket's brightest young prospects. Photo: thejournal.co.uk
Ben Stokes is one of English cricket’s brightest young prospects. Photo: thejournal.co.uk

As for England, it’s impossible to see how any team can be beaten so categorically – by an Australian side that can hardly be described as world-beating – and not make changes. The question is how drastic these will be. In the moments after the conclusion of the Sydney Test, England team director Andy Flower conceded: “It does feel like the end of some type of era and there will be some sort of new start.” Though many feel that the best way to begin this is with Flower’s head, it is highly likely that England’s most successful coach will keep his job; so too the captain, Cook, largely due to a lack of alternatives.

This ‘new start’ for England is most likely to come into effect through a change in style, influenced by some new playing personnel, rather than through drastic changes at the top. The retirement of Graeme Swann has ensured that this process has already begun; no longer do England have a world class spinner who, even when conditions do not suit him, is able to ‘bowl dry’, holding up an end. Without this luxury, England can no longer risk going into Test Matches with only four front line bowlers; what they now need is a five-man attack à la 2005, with a genuine all-rounder to bat at number six.

Thankfully, it seems that, from the gloom of the past couple of months, one shining light has emerged – someone who could provide the key to balancing such a side. We ought to be wary of placing too great a weight of expectation on such young shoulders, but it is impossible not to be excited by the talent Ben Stokes has displayed in his brief international career.

In the entirety of Andrew Flintoff’s career, the talismanic all rounder registered only five centuries and three five wicket hauls; Stokes has achieved one of each inside only four Tests. What is more, the manner in which he has scored his runs and taken his wickets is just what England need. For too long we have been getting by with an uninspiring brand of cricket, relying on the top three to churn out centuries, a tactic effective against lesser opposition but liable to be exposed by the type of aggression displayed by Australia.

For this reason, it is also essential that England ensure that Steven Finn regains the form that has seen him take 90 wickets in only 23 Test Matches. He, like Stokes, has that element of star quality; capable of bowling at speeds of over 90mph, he would have been perfectly suited to the pitches Down Under, and must be ready to play come the first Test of the summer.

Steven Finn recapturing his best form would be a major boost to future English hopes. Photo: kingcricket.co.uk
Steven Finn recapturing his best form would be a major boost to future English hopes. Photo: kingcricket.co.uk

A four-pronged seam attack of Anderson, Broad, Stokes and Finn, with Onions in reserve, looks lethal on English wickets. Such a pace attack may allow England to play leg-spinner Scott Borthwick, a genuine attacking option, in Swann’s open berth. But if not, the best option for the moment may be to stick with Panesar.

Nevertheless, it is not the bowlers who are to blame for this debacle – the fault lies firmly with the batsmen. England’s problem is that players such as Cook, Trott, Pietersen and Bell are statistically some of our country’s greatest ever, with Test records that make them very hard to drop. Trott’s troubles have probably opened up space for some long term freshening-up, but on the whole, these players will remain the mainstay.

The key for England is to ensure they are all fully committed to righting the wrongs of last winter and overseeing the development of future stars such as Root and Ballance. With this healthy mix of experience and youth, England’s batting star could yet rise again, but they must be ready to face extreme pace next time they encounter it.

It may sound strange to be excited about English cricket at this lowest of moments, but with players like Stokes and Balance we are entering into a brave new world. Who knows – their drubbing may in fact allow the England cricket to, like the Phoenix, rise from the Ashes more beautiful than before.

Like Exeposé Sport on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for all the latest in university, local and global sport.

More men to watch out for in the Ashes

Last week, we previewed those names who have already written themselves into Ashes history through their past performances. Now, we should look at those with the chance to add their own chapter this winter.

Michael Carberry – 2013 Ashes: DNP

The man who has benefited most from the warm up games, Carberry is now a shoe-in for the opening berth in the first Test. Despite the fact that Carberry only has one Test cap to his name, he is vastly experienced at First Class level, having been around for more than a decade.

For this reason, he is expected to fill a Rogers-esque role in the side; everyone knows that one day Joe Root will open the batting for England, but for now, some experience is required at the top of the order, meaning Carberry comes in and Root drops down to 6. He has a tough battle ahead of him dealing with the threat of Harris and Johnson, but, if Carberry has a good series, he will be more than just a short-term fill in.

Photo: Wikimedia Commons
Photo: Wikimedia Commons

Joe Root – 2013 Ashes: 339 runs @ 37.66, 3 wickets @ 11.33.

Unquestionably one of England’s brightest talents, most agree that one day Root will succeed Alistair Cook as the side’s premier opening batsman, and perhaps even as England captain. For now though, Root may need to be content with the No. 6 slot in the batting order; though the 180 he made as an opener last summer at Lord’s hinted at the future, if Carberry is to play, Root will drop down to the position he had great success at in his first few Tests.

This should, however, have a positive effect on his batting; last summer, Harris and Siddle caused him problems with the new ball – shielded from it, he should have a better chance to express himself.

Steven Finn – 2013 Ashes: 2 wickets @ 55.50

Tall, quick and bouncy, Finn has all the tools required to succeed Down Under. However, he still lacks the necessary control that would make him a great Test bowler. The warm up matches have shown a typical Finn; though he has always taken a wicket, they have come at a price – something that Flower and Cook know they cannot afford. Having said this, if Finn can add this essential ingredient to his game, he could be a terrifying prospect for the Australians this winter, particularly at Perth with its extra pace and bounce.

[divider]

[poll id=”70″]

[divider]

Chris Tremlett – 2013 Ashes: DNP

A contender to Finn for the third seamer’s spot, Tremlett is the safer bet of the two. Like Finn, Temlett is quick, tall and can extract bounce out of the Aussie wickets, but he also has that essential ingredient of accuracy.

In the ‘10/’11 Ashes, which he came into as a like-for-like replacement for the injured Stuart Broad, Tremlett terrorized the Aussie batsman with pace and bounce, finishing the series with 17 wickets @ 23.35. Since then, his career has been dogged with injuries, but this winter represents a fantastic chance for him to begin an extended run in the Test side.

Dave Warner – 2013 Ashes: 13 runs @ 23.00

Whether it be for a typically exhilarating innings or for throwing a left hook at Root, Warner never seems to be far from the headlines. Brought into the Test team on the basis of his performances in One Day cricket, everything about Warner’s brief Test career has been unorthodox.

Nevertheless, on his day, he is a hugely dangerous prospect; with a Test Match strike rate approaching 70, he can very quickly take the game away from the opposition. However, as his performance in last summer’s Ashes indicated, he is by no means a quality Test Match batsman yet, and if Warner opens for Australia in the first Test, Anderson and Broad will back their chances.

[divider]

See Also: Five things to watch out for at the Ashes

[divider]

Photo: Rhondda (via Flickr)
Photo: Rhondda (via Flickr)

Shane Watson – 2013 Ashes: 418 runs @ 41.80, 2 wickets @ 89.50

Rarely has opinion been so polarised about a single player as it is for Watson. Sometimes he fits his tag as the big, brash Hayden-esque destroyer of bowling attacks, yet often he is subdued and containable. Equally damaging to Australia’s cause is his tendency to get out when set – he has passed 50 23 times in 46 Tests, but has only converted three of these into hundreds – a truly appalling stat for a Test Match opener.

Nevertheless, he hinted at his potential in the final Test of last summer’s Ashes, in which he scored a brilliant 176, and one only needs to watch One Day cricket to see that Watson has the talent to cut it at international level. Australia need their second most experienced batsman to stand up this winter and finally fulfill his potential.

George Bailey – 2013 Ashes: DNP

Until a couple of weeks ago, the name George Bailey meant very little to the cricketing fraternity, apart from the fact that he was a journeyman pro that had somehow been made Australia’s One Day captain. This all changed in the thrilling One Day series between Australia and India that was contested last month, in which Bailey played out of his skin, scoring 478 runs @ 95.60 with a barely believable strike rate of 116.

After such a phenomenal feat of run scoring, there was no way that Australia’s Test side – in desperate need of some batting strength – could turn their back on such a ready-made option. It would be sheer madness if the Australian selectors did not select Bailey to bat in the middle order for the First Test.

Mitchell Johnson – 2013 Ashes: DNP

The hecklers will be very pleased to hear that Johnson is well and truly back in contention for an Ashes spot. The inconsistent left arm seamer has been bowling seriously quickly over the past few months, giving first the England One Day side and then India some serious hurry-up. On his day, Johnson can be lethal, as shown at Headingley in ‘09 and Perth in ‘10/’11, where he ran through England’s middle order in a brilliant spell of 6/38.

However, the flipside to Johnson is the one seen at Lord’s in ‘09 and Brisbane in ‘10/’11, where England cashed in on his loose bowling. Australia would love the first version of Johnson to turn up this winter; if he does, England’s batsmen have a serious threat to contend with.

So, these are the players who have the chance to make history this winter; the question as to whether they do or don’t should make this series compelling viewing.

Ben Pullan, Sports Team

England produce scrappy draw against NZ in Dunedin

Photo credits to Ramograph

England have recently gained a reputation as slow starters in Test series away from home. Coming into this series with New Zealand, England had been bowled out for less than 200 in the first innings of the first Test in their last three Series away from home: against Pakistan, Sri Lanka and India.

Nevertheless, after the first day in Dunedin was lost to rain, it still came as a shock when Alastair Cook’s men collapsed to a measly 167 before tea on the second day. This against a New Zealand side placed above only Bangladesh in the ICC’s Test Rankings.

Theories abounded as to the reasons behind such an abject batting performance; the New Zealand attack possessed no great threat and the pitch had appeared relatively placid. The conclusion was that England had entered the game undercooked, having had only one warm-up game in which to prepare. There was certainly evidence for this as English batsmen threw their wickets away through poor shot selection and execution.

The pitch certainly looked docile as the New Zealand batsmen appeared untroubled, setting about compiling a large first innings lead. Debutant Hamish Rutherford stood out in particular – the 23 year-old compiled a near-faultless 171 off of just 217 balls. Ably supported by his opening partner Peter Fulton, the two put on 158 for the first wicket.

England’s bowlers followed their batsmen’s lead by being seemingly under-prepared for the strains of Test match cricket. James Anderson proved the stand out, capturing four wickets. Brendon McCullum just had time to add an entertaining 74 before New Zealand finally declared on 460/9 on the fourth morning, a lead of 293.

As England began their second innings, it was assumed impossible for them to perform worse than they had in the first. England have also had a knack of being able to dig themselves out of some tough situations in the past, as they did in the first Test of the 2010 Ashes series in Australia. On the other hand, in order to save the game they were going to have to bat for the best part of two days. This challenge was hindered further by the fact that Nick Compton walked to the wicket effectively batting for his position in the side.

Talk in the build-up to the game focused on the performances of Joe Root and his potential to usurp Compton at the top of the order, this after the Somerset man had produced a set of steady but ultimately uninspiring performances in India. However, Compton’s temperament proved magnificent as he scored his maiden Test match hundred, thus securing his place for the medium term.

As has become almost expected of him, England’s ‘Captain reliable’ supported him superbly. Alastair Cook scored his 24th hundred in Test matches, though this was rather over-shadowed by Compton’s achievements. By the time Cook fell late on day four for 116 the game looked to be petering out for a draw.

Day five at Dunedin was one for the cricketing purists. Compton failed to build on his overnight total, going early on for 117. However, Jonathan Trott and night-watchman Steven Finn made the game safe for England. The latter crafted a dogged 56 off of 203 balls, his first Test and First-Class fifty.

The only sour point was another failure for Kevin Pietersen, who will be looking to improve his form ahead of the Ashes in the summer. There was an hour left of scheduled play when the two Captains eventually shook hands and called it a draw as England reached 421/6.

The Second Test starts on Wednesday night (21.30 GMT) in Wellington. England remain favourites to win the series despite their poor performance in the First innings – they should be lifted by their ability to stave off defeat, whilst New Zealand may feel deflated by their inability to kill off a game they dominated for long periods. However, England must remain vigilant and ensure that there is no repeat performance of their First innings collapse.

Alex Manning

 

[poll id=”26″]