Tag Archives: Twitter

Interview Transcript: Billy Bragg

Veteran singer-songwriter Billy Bragg took time out of his Tooth and Nail Tour to talk America, Twitter and (you guessed it) politics with an inspired Exeposé Music…

 

Hey Billy, how’re the press commitments going?

Not too bad. I have some promo to catch up with after getting back from the States, The terrible thing about this job it’s what you do when you’re not playing. I’ve been doing this for thirty years now and I guess it’s probably 5 years of playing gigs and 25 years of waiting to play gigs.

 

Image Credit: wikicommons.org
Image Credit: wikicommons.org

Your latest album Tooth and Nail was recorded over 5 days and has a strong American influence. Do you feel you’re becoming more American sounding?

 A lot of us were inspired by America in our youth. It’s always kind of in there. It’s bound to come out. Working with Wilko allowed me to explore something I’ve never really been able to do on my own. And my new album is an attempt to find a way back into that mould.

 

How do you see that trans-cultural exchange now with bands like Mumford and Sons breaking into the America mainstream?

They’re a prime example of selling banjo music back to the Americans. It’s the thing that we’ve always been able to do: slightly change their music in a way and sell it back to them. I mean, the Beatles were playing the music of black America. It’s something that’s always happened.

 

During your songwriting period socialism had a clear unambiguous identity. People seem more apathetic now. Or, at least, there is no clear target to direct political anger at. Do you think it’s harder to write political songs now?

There’s not only an ambiguity. There’s a lack of politics in our political discourse. You could say the politics we have these days are a retail politics; they do the same thing in two different packages, whereas back in the 80s Neil Kinnock was the absolute opposite of Margaret Thatcher. If I met Margaret Thatcher I knew I would have nothing in common with her. And now I hear David Cameron’s a fan of The Smiths. I mean, what the fuck is that about?

Also people are much more engaged with the internet now. When I was 19 there was only one medium available to me, and that was music. And at the time music was really the only social medium as a way of communicating with one another. And music was a stylistic thing: what record you were carrying around defined who you were. It’s how we spoke to our parent’s generation. Now there’s all sorts of mediums and social media you can use to get your point across.

 

Have developments in technology helped or hindered songwriting?

The real difference between music and twitter is that no one will invite me to New York to read out my tweets. But the other thing is that music offers something. And that is to bring a sense of community, to bring the audience together to debate issues that they otherwise might not express their feelings about.

Music doesn’t have an agency when it comes to change; only people have agency but music does have an important role to play in making people feel that they are not alone in their community. That’s how music inspired me.

 

So music is the beginning rather than the end of the process…

 Music is the spark, it’s the way that you know you’re not alone. You need to remember that. Because sometimes people have a cynical view of politics: politicians are all shit, nothings ever going to change… I feel like that sometimes too. But the only real way to overcome that is by engaging and being active, and that’s what I’m trying to get people to do.

 

Music seems to create a space in which like-minded individuals can come together and share their experiences in order to facilitate political action. I experienced this at Bestival with Pip’s Satin Lizard Longue. Like-minded people got together and sharing ideas…

Exactly. That’s why I got from Rock Against Racism in 1978. I came across a lot of casual racism and I never said anything because I was only 19 but I went on this march to the park where this gig was and there was 100,000 people just like me and I realised I was not alone. When I went back to work I started to speak up. But it wasn’t the Clash who gave me the courage to express my convictions; it was being in that audience and that helped me to understand what my role in music is now: not to lead but to help inspire people and to put in their minds another perspective to provoke engagement.

 

You said we live in a post-ideological world where your songs may not directly apply to current political struggles. So is there a need for someone new – perhaps Ed Sheeran or Frank Turner – to become the face of a movement, like yourself, Dylan or Lennon?

You always need someone to inspire you. Instead of seeing someone who looks like your dad on stage, seeing someone who looks like you has a greater impact….I’m not saying that facetiously. I was into the Stones when I went to see the Clash and the Stones were 15 years older than me. When I saw the Clash they were my age and I thought “fuckin’ hell I could do that”. I had no idea how to become the Stones, but I could see how to become the Clash. But that is really important. There needs to be a space where that idea can be nurtured.

 

What kind of space?

 If I was 19 and getting the shit I would get on Twitter for posting my political views I would think ‘fuck this’. When I was making my first political ideas in the music press, the editors of the three music magazines – Magazine Maker, NME and Sounds – were all children of 1968 and that meant that they believed that musicians should be able to express the ideal creation of a society; you were expected to say that. So if you did say it people would take what you said seriously. Whereas now you’re more likely to get piss poured on you for saying something. And it’s that cynicism that I feel is a real enemy. Before we become creative and speak to each other we need to overcome that sense of cynicism and the cynics out there that try to chop everything down. I find that most disturbing.

 

What’s the best way for young people to counter that cynicism and channel energy into something more worthwhile? Is it possible?

The reason why I became a political songwriter is because I was engaged in a struggle: the Miners’ Strike. And the struggle fed the songs. You find yourself a cause, you get involved, you write the songs to go with that cause. The cause will keep you living. The fact your aiming at a particular goal. You’re not just out there throwing out ideas with no anchor. You’re writing about something that you feel.

It’s not about writing political songs mate. It’s about you telling us the pressure that you are under. Not about capital being political. It’s about capital being pressure. You’re under pressure right? Tell people about it. Write people songs about it. It doesn’t have to be your ideas throughout the world that will be perfect. It’s about you writing about that pressure that you’re under. You shouldn’t go out and say ‘excuse me, I’ve got an idea.’ Get out and fucking grab it by the scruff of the neck. Say this is actually happening to me you mean boy, and you better take notice of it. It’s like punk – that make sense? I wanna hear from your generation telling us about the pressure that you’re under.

 

Do you think guitar music is the right medium? Does it matter about the medium?

It’s about whatever medium feels good to you, whatever medium you feel comfortable with. And I think that the more accessible it is the better. There’s no one single way to do this. There’s loads and loads of different ways. And every single way is right. So don’t think ‘I better be doing this, I better be doing that.’ Find your skill, find your anger and throw them together. Fix your brain in and go out there and show your point to the world.

Life’s A Riot is 35 years old this year. That was my last gasp. If that had failed I would have been fucked. Here I am 30 years later still doing the same songs, same gigs, same job and it’s brilliant. So keep at it mate. You’ve got your perspective. It’s about pressure. Don’t think you’ve got to write about the dialectic y’know. Write about your personal pressure. If you write about that, everybody else feels that. If you write about the dialectic people will be thinking ‘I wonder what he’s on about.’ You write about the pressure that you’re under. That will find the cause and hopefully that will give you a lift.

 

But it can be quite hard to stand up and say something in a society that insists on preserving the status quo…

“Just because you’re better than me/ doesn’t mean I’m lazy/ Just because you’re going forwards doesn’t mean I’m going backwards”. It’s as simple as that. People relate to that. So get focused on where you feel that pressure is coming from in your generation and write about it and people will respond to that.

You’re the generation since the war who will grow up poorer than your parents. Get you’re fucking arse in gear and write something about it. You’re wasting your time with Twitter. Get active and get writing.

A Summer Of Sexism

Gemma Joyce discusses her experiences of sexism this summer, and the differences between how sexism is dealt with on the internet and in everyday life.

The university bubble is a great one. It’s vibrant and varied, and everything is up for debate and discussion. After enjoying my first year writing sassy essays on feminism and taking part in the fiery debate over whether The Sun should be banned from sale on campus I returned, feeling far more aware of contemporary issues, to my beloved hometown ready to start my summer working a busy bar in a family pub.

Caroline Criado-Perez. Image Credits: BBC.
Caroline Criado-Perez. Image Credit: BBC

My uni bubble promptly burst.

Whether or not we are studying ‘Degrees in Misogyny’ as The Daily Mail would like its readership to believe, acceptable social conduct seems to differ quite significantly between my generally polite and considerate peers in the lecture theatre to the ‘polite and considerate’ customers that insist on calling female bar staff ‘gorgeous’, ‘babe’ or ‘lovey’ without affording similarly demeaning names to their male colleagues.

From not taking food recommendations seriously because “she’s a girl, of course she’d recommend the chocolate brownie,” to more hurtful remarks about your looks or unfounded and unnecessary assumptions voiced about your sexual preferences and behaviours, sexism is undoubtedly alive and kicking in the workplace, most blatantly in environments where alcohol is present. Such behaviour from customers not only ruins your day but leaves you feeling quite helpless, when it’s generally accepted as part of the job and refusing to serve such customers just makes matters worse.

Of course, sexism in the workplace is not breaking news. But there is a great divide between dealing with sexism in the ‘real world’ and sexism online that needs to be addressed.

The summer has seen an enormous amount of debate over issues regarding sexism, much of which has taken place online.

Laura Bates’ Everyday Sexism Project has continued to gain popularity and media attention with more and more users of all walks of life adding their stories describing sexist behaviour they are subjected to on a daily basis.  The press went wild when it was made public knowledge that the internet, particularly on sites like Twitter, was becoming a hotbed of sexist hatred channelled through anonymous insults and threats of violence.

This was highlighted in particular by acclaimed classicist Mary Beard and feminist campaigner Caroline Criado-Perez, who led the campaign to have Jane Austen printed on the £10 note. Both were made victims of hundreds of abusive messages, and were very vocal in showcasing their negative experiences to the international press.  Next came Caitlin Moran’s brief campaign #twittersilence, which aimed to boycott Twitter for a day in order to bring their attention to the issue of unacceptable threats being made with a shoddy process of reporting them. The Twitter silence divided opinion, but the message was clear: Stop the threats!

The internet is a powerful tool in discussing such issues, and the massive interest generated by recent events has led service providers to at least consider tougher security processes for their well meaning users. Trolling will hopefully, one day, become a thing of the past.

What will be interesting is whether sexism will be addressed in the ‘real world’ before or after it is in cyberspace. Current public anger towards the Twitter trolls being named and shamed all over the newspapers is not reflected in the night club where sexual assault goes unreported weekly, at a busy bus stop where a car full of lads drives past beeping and shouting “Get your tits out!” to a bystander, or in the accountancy firm where the female staff are paid less than their male counterparts. Of course not every troll is subject to this naming and shaming process, but their act of idiocy is put on record. Every day sexism is not recorded even fractionally compared to that experienced on the internet.

While anger is growing at sexism on the internet, I can’t boycott my job because I’m unhappy that some customers leave me feeling uncomfortable and angry. Nor can I shout “Why don’t you take your sexist comments and FUCK OFF. Hashtag shouting back!” – I can’t imagine the families in the restaurant jumping to their feet in applause, metaphorically ‘retweeting’ and ‘liking.’ I would simply lose my job.

I long for the day when a sexist comment is considered more rude than not saying “please” after ordering a drink, or leaving food all over the table when leaving a restaurant.

My point is that “shouting back,” the phrase Twitter uses to describe the act of correcting an act of sexism, is much harder in person than it is online, particularly when your job is on the line. My online self would happily condemn a sexist comment made in the real world or on the internet, but sadly my real life self struggling to fund my student lifestyle remains at a loss at dealing with sexism at work.

Gemma Joyce

Celebrity culture – a step in the wrong direction?

8249072289_9b21af2e3b
Image credit: Justin Bieber Day

With celebrity culture an ever-present part of our society, Conor Byrne discusses whether it is a problem, and where the future lies. 

Celebrity culture is undoubtedly a crucial social, cultural and increasingly political phenomenon in today’s world, particularly in the West. We constantly follow celebrities on Twitter, Facebook and through the media (newspapers, magazines, TV); we want to meet them, we want to emulate them, we want to see what they are really like. But the purpose of this features article is to pose the question: has celebrity culture gone a step too far and become something dark and sinister?

Justin Bieber has to be the most recognisable celebrity in today’s world; adored by legions of female fans who will do literally anything for their idol. The smallest slight to Bieber is mercilessly attacked by these figural bodyguards, who spring into action whenever they perceive a wrong done to this angelic creature. Just look at, for instance, the abuse faced by actress Olivia Wilde when she dared to voice her opinion on Twitter about Bieber. When the American singer was photographed without his shirt on in London earlier this month while celebrating his nineteenth birthday, Wilde tweeted: ‘Bieber, put your f**king shirt on’. Probably not surprisingly, the actress then met a barrage of abuse from Bieber supporters on Twitter. But this does not seem so strange when you consider the story earlier this month.

Photo Credits: chunkysalsa
Image Credit: chunkysalsa

When 15-year old Courtney Barrasford tweeted that she liked Bieber’s new album, despite not previously being a fan, she was then retweeted by Bieber to his 34 million followers. Disturbingly, these jealous fans sent the teenager threatening and cruel messages. But arguably the depressed nature of the tweets addressed to Bieber himself was even more disturbing. One wrote: ‘U notice her n she’s not even a fan. I am but you won’t notice me Can anyone hear me crying?’ Even when taking this with a pinch of salt, it is worrying that anyone would be so obsessive over a celebrity that they could bring themselves write such a thing.

The sad case of Britney Spears is perhaps another example. In 2007, amidst mounting personal troubles, Spears famously shaved her head at a hair salon in Los Angeles. She then admitted herself into various treatment facilities, having previously stayed at a drug rehabilitation facility in Antigua for less than a day. Others have commented that Spears’ concerts see dwindling interest and plummeting ticket sales. Despite this, Britney was the top-earning female musician in 2012. Britney, too, has encountered troubles and intense criticism, maybe not to the same extent as Bieber, through her status as a celebrity, opening her up to ridicule, fascination and constant scrutiny. Surely she is not adored so much for who she is – being a musician – but for what she represents: teenage girls’ aspirations to be famous, successful, a singer, inspiring thousands of copycat lookalikes who want to actually become Britney.

There is evidence, of course, to the contrary, for the positivity of celebrity culture. Celebrities are able to use their fame for good purposes – look at Heather Mill’s charitable pursuits, while other celebrities speak out against crimes, political issues, issues of gender and sexuality, and make a very real difference in society (consider Lady Gaga and Cher’s public support for gay rights). Celebrity culture has always been with us, and to be fair Justin Bieber and Britney Spears are probably extreme examples, because they are the most famous of the famous. Most celebrities do not deal with anything of the sort that Justin Bieber does – in that sense, he is a unique phenomenon. Celebrity culture is arguably fun, exciting and enrapturing – but as long as people stop short of becoming obsessive in the sense of becoming stalkers or attacking cruelly and vindictively anyone who dares voice any criticism of their beloved celebrity.

The criticism and victimisation of teenage girls on Twitter for their tweets about Justin Bieber is a very pressing issue, but at the end of the day we all have freedom of speech and celebrity culture is so embedded in Western culture that it is something that inevitably raises questions and features in the media daily, hourly. Maybe there is something to be said for educating our young people differently as for better or for worse – we are a celebrity society, and whether or not it is going the right way, we have to accept that it is here to stay.

Conor Byrne

A Harry Styles Happy Birthday: Exeposé speaks to Alice Cousins

One Direction fan and Exeter drama student, Alice Cousins received a particularly special birthday present when Harry Styles sent her a tweet:

Within minutes, the story had gone viral but in amongst the angry tweets, sensational news headlines across the globe and Taylor Swift comparisons was a very lucky birthday girl…

Hey Alice – happy belated birthday!

So, how did Harry Styles end up tweeting at you?

Image credit: David Fisher/Rex Features
Image credit: David Fisher/Rex Features

I used to go to Birmingham University but dropped out and one of my flatmates there I still keep in contact with, because she is so lovely. Herself and the Styles family are family friends and she kindly texted him asking him to tweet me happy birthday because, to quote “she’s rather obsessed with you” and sent him the picture of me and the cardboard cutout which my parents had gotten me as a joke for my birthday.

How did you react when you found out?
After she sent me a screen shot of the text she sent to him, then I screamed because he texted back saying “okay”, I ran up to my mum screaming and told her, where she also screamed (also a massive boyband fan, runs in the family). Then five minutes later, I looked at my phone and saw I had loads of random people adding me on facebook and I thought how odd it was and knew something was up so I checked twitter where I had gone up by 300 followers and people were retweeting his tweet.

I couldn’t see the original tweet because I had so many interactions coming up and then people were tweeting me saying he was following me when I just went mental and was jumping up and down and screaming. My mum was on the phone to my aunty telling her all about it and both my sister’s posting it all over facebook! I quickly rang my best friend to tell her to check it out where she handled the nasty tweets by telling people to “piss off”!

How was your birthday – did you get any other good presents? 
My birthday was already amazing; waking up to my house covered in balloons and banners courtesy of my lovely housemates. I then had lunch with them at the Vic where they gave me my present of a personalized ipod which I was just taken aback by, and then travelled back home where my parents scared the life out of me with the Harry Styles cut-out, which I thought was just hilarious. My parents bought me some amazing presents including the Mulberry bag I asked them for and not expected to get and my sister’s got me some Ray-Bans so I already had the best birthday.

Image credit: Alice Cousins
Image credit: Alice Cousins

Has Harry contacted you since?
Apart from replying to my tweet saying “no worries, have a good one. x” I unfortunately haven’t heard anything, and don’t expect to!

How big of a One Direction fan were you before?
Everyone who knows me, knows I am just a massive boyband fan and so One Direction are just my favourite. For Christmas, my sister got me a 1D mug and I’ve been given a Harry Styles poster for secret santa before.

Who is your favourite and why?
Harry is obviously my favourite – my ex boyfriend looks suspiciously like him. I think I have a penchant for brunettes and a cheeky smile!

There seems to have been some nasty twitter reactions: what did they say and how did you react?
Everyone is saying that there have been nasty tweets, but I haven’t really taken any notice of them. They all seem to be more directed at Harry and angry that he never noticed their birthday. A lot of the tweets I felt really saddened by as they were saying things like “you’ll never notice me because I’m ugly”.

I also think a lot of the people thought the cardboard cut out was actually him which I thought was hilarious. I’m not taking anything too personally, I know there are a lot of crazed fans out there who are just jealous and confused as to how I got tweeted.

What do you think of the story going national and suddenly being famous?
The story making the newspapers has literally just baffled me. It shows the power of One Direction and twitter and how the media blow things all out of proportion. If I didn’t have curly hair in that picture, they wouldn’t think I look like Taylor Swift but I’m sure they’d have made another story!

I’m taking it all light heartedly as I’m sure my fifteen minutes of fame will be over by tomorrow and they’ll have moved on to another un-news worthy story!

Thanks for your time, Alice!  

What do you all think: is Harry Styles a top bloke for tweeting happy birthday to Alice, or should he have been tweeting happy birthday to every single one of his fans? Answer in our poll below…

[poll id=”30″]

Olivia Luder, Online Editor

Caption Contest!

 

Photo credits to JD Hancock
Photo credits to JD Hancock

What?

This month, we’re giving you the opportunity to win a Waterstones voucher worth £10

How?

It’s simple. All you have to do is submit a caption to the photo above. It can be silly, serious, funny or sad. We only have a couple of rules- keep it clean and keep it short(ish).

When?

The deadline for entering is Monday 18th March and the winner will be announced the following day.

Where?

Email exepose-comment@xmedia.ex.ac.uk and keep checking the website or Facebook and Twitter for the results.

Good Luck!

Comment

Celebrity: the new oracle of reason?

Picture credits: markhillary
Unhealthy obsession? Picture credits: markhillary

Meg Lawrence asks whether the views of celebrities really matter in our society.

Celebrity is the new religion. But did you realise it’s also the new oracle of reason? It’s nothing new, since the golden age of cinema celebrities have used their fame and public position to voice ideas about politics and society. But in this modern age, where social media is at its height, celebrities have an unparalleled opportunity to share their opinions with the world. How thoughtful.

Don’t believe me? On Twitter, the most followed people are Justin Bieber, Lady Gaga and Katy Perry, whose followers amount to over 100M. If you have an interest in politics, you might like to know that Barack Obama takes fifth place on this list, with 26M followers. Clearly there are many who want to hear what Justin had for breakfast, but when do the opinions of celebrities become overbearing? We all have the right to exercise our freedom of speech, but when does this cross the line?

I’d hazard a guess that the answer is when they have absolutely nothing to add to intellectual debate. For example, in a recent interview surrounding his new Die Hard movie, Bruce Willis condemned any gun laws that could infringe rights guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the US Constitution. Whilst Willis dismissed links between his new gun-filled movie and his protests against the proposed legislation, it is rather coincidental that he chose to promote both at the same time. Bruce Willis is an action movie star. The debate should be confined to how good an actor he is, not his views on gun legislation. The day Barack Obama appears in the latest Die Hard movie we can perhaps spare some time to listen to Willis’ political ramblings.

Dame Helen Mirren recently announced that she believed victims of date rape shouldn’t expect the issue to go to court. Mirren stated that she had been a victim ‘a couple of times,’ but believed it was a matter that should be sorted between those involved. This relates back to the dated ‘she was asking for it’ defence, which shows complete disregard for the safety and respect of women. Even politicians should think twice before sharing their bigoted views with the world.

Picture credits: ShowbizReporter
Justin Bieber, whose followers on Twitter now amount to over 100 million. Picture credits: ShowbizReporter

Former Conservative MP Ann Widdecombe backed Mirren’s statement, saying, ‘(a woman) should accept that she has got herself into that position. What’s she asking for? A cup of tea?’ It’s particularly frightening when a member of the party that leads our country holds such backward, harmful views. According to the Home Office, 60,000 women are raped every year, but of these cases only ten per cent are known to the police, and of those known only six per cent result in a conviction. No wonder more women don’t come forward.

Despite this, there are times, although I hate to admit it, when celebrity expression is invaluable. Barack Obama’s 2012 election campaign was endorsed by celebrities such as Jay-Z, Stephen Spielberg and George Clooney, each of whom will have induced some public opinion into voting for Obama. Am I guilty of only wanting celebrity endorsement when I happen to agree with the individual’s opinions? Maybe. But I satisfy myself that my opinions aren’t to the detriment of others.

Celebrities need to remember why they’re famous. While it may be great that Hilary Duff supported Obama, who really cares? We wouldn’t ask a chef to express their view on the latest medical advancements, so why should celebrities be able to express their opinions about areas which they have no expertise in?

If a famous person can use their status to motivate others to take action, it is to be applauded. But I would hope that they would think long and hard about the power of their influence. It’s easy to lose count of the number of celebrities who complain about intrusion into their private lives – I believe the greatest travesty is how they manage to intrude into ours.

A Twitter User's Freedom of Tweets

Tom Bond, Exeposé Print Books Editor, looks at Suzanne Moore’s recent Twitter row and argues the importance of sites like Twitter to offer everyone a voice, whether professional writer or not.

Photo credits to espacio CAMON
Photo credits to espacio CAMON

Last week a writer left Twitter and Twitter ate itself in a cycle of outrage and anger. In a piece for Red, The Waterstones Anthology, titled ‘Seeing red: the power of female anger’, Suzanne Moore called for women to embrace their anger in the fight for gender equality. As she proudly announces, “Sex Pistol John Lydon’s chant, ‘anger is an energy’, is still my cri de coeur”. Her points are vociferously made, covering a wide range of issues too numerous to address here. I suggest you read the article for yourselves and make your own judgments, but sadly, the content of the article is not why I am writing. I am writing because of the ferocious response she has received, primarily to her use of one small phrase, that for many people, undermines her whole argument. At the end of the piece she praises the power of anger, saying, “cherish it, for this is how the future will be made.” I wonder if the anger she has received in reply has made her rue the prophetic nature of her words.

The offending sentence describes the negative female psychology of the body, claiming, “We are angry with ourselves for not being happier, not being loved properly and not having the ideal body shape – that of a Brazilian transsexual.” Within minutes she had been called out for her choice of example with one Twitter user saying “I loved your piece on anger – except for the shock transphobia. Trans women deserve solidarity, not implicit shaming.” Even after reading several articles explaining people’s outrage I don’t quite see the issue in the phrase she used. Moore later justified her choice, saying “I deliberately used the word Brazilian transexual [sic] as ideal shape small hips and big T and A.” The problem truly arose a few tweets later when Moore embraced her manifesto of anger and began to dig her own grave, replying with things like “I dont [sic] prioritise this fucking lopping bits of your body over all else that is happening to women Intersectional enough for you?” and “People can just fuck off really. Cut their dicks off and be more feminist than me. Good for them.” As reasoned and powerful as her original article was, her responses have turned it into nothing more than another online soap opera.

These days, the battleground for debate is virtual, with articles, links and opinions traded with fervour across Twitter, Facebook and online comment threads. The fact that you can find a host of reactionary idiots in these places is hardly a revolutionary one but the more we rely on these formats the more important it becomes. I agree with most but not all of Moore’s original article but I strongly disagree with her bullish and aggressive response to others’ outrage. By dismissing the complaints and queries of the trans people that took offence with her article she is doing just what she has attacked the patriarchy for. She is shutting down a minority opinion from her position of relative power and dismissing its relevance offhand.

Her self-acknowledged friend and ally Julie Burchill rode to Moore’s defence on a bucking bronco days later in an Observer article that was later removed with an apology by the editor. Make no mistake, Burchill’s piece exists solely to troll the nation and its argument consists of little more than a string of insults flung at transgender people through a blinding red mist. Nevertheless I will always defend her right to publish such an article, however offensive it may be. Toby Young from the Telegraph accused The Observer of censoring Burchill, though more accurately it was a case of editorial cold feet. Denying someone the right to use your publication as a platform for views you find deeply offensive is not the same as denying them the right of free speech.

Twitter is brilliant because you can speak directly to your heroes and people you admire, even if Salman Rushdie did think I was insulting him. You can interact with professionals who do what you one day dream of doing, and sometimes they even reply. Twitter is a beautifully democratic medium, allowing everyone their say. The problem is that it gives a voice to the abusive as much as the open-minded who use Twitter in search of knowledge and entertainment.

There is hope though in the way people have responded to such abuse, with Moore, her attackers and Burchill all being condemned by the vast majority of users. Twitter demonstrates the ultimate strength of freedom of speech, allowing everyone to contribute whether they have a national newspaper column or not, and then to be judged fairly by their peers.

Guild removes ELLE and FHM mags following Twitter outburst

The Students’ Guild has removed free copies of ELLE and FHM magazine from Devonshire House after students complained that Russell Group University students are “into more than clothes and tits”.

Free copies of ELLE and FHM magazine were yesterday being given away for free in Devonshire House, leading to a backlash from students who voiced opposition to the selection of magazines provided, claiming that both titles portray women in an objective manner.

One tweet read: “@ExeterGuild, as a RG uni- don’t you think our excellent @UniofExeter student body is into more than clothes & tits?”

Another read: “So @ExeterGuild are giving away lads mags. I despair”

ellefhm1

In direct response to the complaints, the Guild removed copies of ELLE and FHM the following day and issued a statement to Exeposé explaining their actions: “For the last few months the Guild has given students the option to pick up a free copy of ELLE or FHM from Devonshire House, allowing them to save money on the retail price.”

“Having been alerted to the opposing views of some of the students towards the selection of magazines provided, the Guild has decided that to best represent the student body, the free copies would be removed from Devonshire House without delay”.

The Students’ Guild caused controversy in 2009 when free copies of FHM were removed from Freshers’ welcome packs following similar complaints.

By Tom Payne, Editor 

What are you thoughts? E-mail editors@exepose.com, or comment below!

Sexism in gaming: Naomi Poltier looks at the #1reasonwhy Twitter storm

Aveline, the main character from Assassin’s Creed Liberation. Photography PSMANIA

When I ask a friend if I can play Call Of Duty with him, he knows what he is in for. I suck at Call of Duty, he will spend the next few hours trying to teach me how to suck less. I am a girl, after all it is to be expected. The stereotype is nowhere near false; most girls are not as good at video games as boys due to what is possibly lack of interest, and boys love teasing us about it. However, what they love more than that are girls who adore video games. Last week, for example, a boy on the Facebook page “Confessions of a University Student” told the story of coming across a tipsy girl at the bar who knew all the maps and guns to the game Black Ops. He wrote “.. On top of that she was funny and a great crack!” A few minutes later her friends come and drag her away. The boy ends with “We want this to be posted everywhere so if you see this please know that we haven’t forgotten about you, will wait for you every Tuesday night.” The ending is quite humorous and everyone can relate to it, after all if I met a guy who liked to sit around and draw while watching Rom-com’s, I would get pretty excited too.

But around November 27th a phenomenon exploded on Twitter called #1reasonwhy, letting women working in the game industry talk about their opinion on the number one reason why there aren’t more women making games. More than anything, what was revealed was repressed anger being undermined by men in the workplace.

Some examples include:

  • “Because I get mistaken for the receptionist or day-hire marketing at trade shows.”
  • “The worst sexism is the “harmless” assumptions. I’m sick of being told art is the only appropriate career for a woman in games
  • Because when a man condescends to me, I’m told it’s because I’m wearing a pink skirt
  • Being mistaken for male co-founder’s assistant …three times? four?
  • Because I have other women in the games industry tell me to “just be quiet” if I don’t want to be harassed.

 

Evolution of Lara Croft, 97-07Photography by ORIONSAINT

The irony lies here in the #1, as there are evidently far more reasons to why women in the games industry feel interiorized. The question then is, why? Is it because they are outnumbered? Research says that women make up just 12% of the development workforce in the games industry in Britain. But even then, one tweet explains how even after having had more success than her university colleague, he still tells her she doesn’t belong. Is it sexism? I don’t want to toss the term around so in accordance to the idea that sexism is “discrimination or devaluation based on a person’s sex,” it is. The men dominate the gaming world due to more interest and when a girl can play the game, they love it.  A girlfriend who can stay up until 3 am playing FIFA is awesome, however if she’s telling you what to do in the workplace, she’s out of her league. It seems too easy. Is it time to re-evaluate who can and can’t make the games? After all Gears of War 3, Uncharted 3 and Deus Ex are all games programmed by women. Women may be outnumbered when it comes to games, but to assume they are all inept in the domain is false as well.

Naomi Poltier,

If you want to find out more about the ‘1reasonwhy’ issue and sexism in the games industry, find out at the following links below:

http://www.mattiebrice.com/?p=26

http://www.gender-focus.com/2012/12/02/1reasonwhy-truths-from-women-in-the-gaming-world/

http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2012/06/13/tropes-vs-women-in-video-games-vs-the-internet/

Note that Exepose Online cannot be held responsible for the content of websites over which it has no control.